Adaptive Neural Algorithms for PCA and ICA

R. Mutihac
{"title":"Adaptive Neural Algorithms for PCA and ICA","authors":"R. Mutihac","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9.CH004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial neural networks (ANNs) (McCulloch & Pitts, 1943) (Haykin, 1999) were developed as models of their biological counterparts aiming to emulate the real neural systems and mimic the structural organization and function of the human brain. Their applications were based on the ability of self-designing to solve a problem by learning the solution from data. A comparative study of neural implementations running principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) was carried out. Artificially generated data additively corrupted with white noise in order to enforce randomness were employed to critically evaluate and assess the reliability of data projections. Analysis in both time and frequency domains showed the superiority of the estimated independent components (ICs) relative to principal components (PCs) in faithful retrieval of the genuine (latent) source signals. Neural computation belongs to information processing dealing with adaptive, parallel, and distributed (localized) signal processing. In data analysis, a common task consists in finding an adequate subspace of multivariate data for subsequent processing and interpretation. Linear transforms are frequently employed in data model selection due to their computational and conceptual simplicity. Some common linear transforms are PCA, factor analysis (FA), projection pursuit (PP), and, more recently, ICA (Comon, 1994). The latter emerged as an extension of nonlinear PCA (Hotelling, 1993) and developed in the context of blind source separation (BSS) (Cardoso, 1998) in signal and array processing. ICA is also related to recent theories of the visual brain (Barlow, 1991), which assume that consecutive processing steps lead to a progressive reduction in the redundancy of representation (Olshausen and Field, 1996). This contribution is an overview of the PCA and ICA neuromorphic architectures and their associated algorithmic implementations increasingly used as exploratory techniques. The discussion is conducted on artificially generated suband super-Gaussian source signals. BACKGROUND","PeriodicalId":320314,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9.CH004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) (McCulloch & Pitts, 1943) (Haykin, 1999) were developed as models of their biological counterparts aiming to emulate the real neural systems and mimic the structural organization and function of the human brain. Their applications were based on the ability of self-designing to solve a problem by learning the solution from data. A comparative study of neural implementations running principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) was carried out. Artificially generated data additively corrupted with white noise in order to enforce randomness were employed to critically evaluate and assess the reliability of data projections. Analysis in both time and frequency domains showed the superiority of the estimated independent components (ICs) relative to principal components (PCs) in faithful retrieval of the genuine (latent) source signals. Neural computation belongs to information processing dealing with adaptive, parallel, and distributed (localized) signal processing. In data analysis, a common task consists in finding an adequate subspace of multivariate data for subsequent processing and interpretation. Linear transforms are frequently employed in data model selection due to their computational and conceptual simplicity. Some common linear transforms are PCA, factor analysis (FA), projection pursuit (PP), and, more recently, ICA (Comon, 1994). The latter emerged as an extension of nonlinear PCA (Hotelling, 1993) and developed in the context of blind source separation (BSS) (Cardoso, 1998) in signal and array processing. ICA is also related to recent theories of the visual brain (Barlow, 1991), which assume that consecutive processing steps lead to a progressive reduction in the redundancy of representation (Olshausen and Field, 1996). This contribution is an overview of the PCA and ICA neuromorphic architectures and their associated algorithmic implementations increasingly used as exploratory techniques. The discussion is conducted on artificially generated suband super-Gaussian source signals. BACKGROUND
PCA和ICA的自适应神经算法
人工神经网络(ANNs) (McCulloch & Pitts, 1943) (Haykin, 1999)是作为其生物对应物的模型而发展起来的,旨在模仿真实的神经系统,模仿人类大脑的结构组织和功能。它们的应用是基于自我设计的能力,通过从数据中学习解决方案来解决问题。对运行主成分分析(PCA)和独立成分分析(ICA)的神经网络实现进行了比较研究。人为生成的数据加白噪声破坏,以加强随机性,以严格评估和评估数据预测的可靠性。时域和频域分析表明,估计的独立分量(ic)相对于主分量(pc)在真实(潜在)源信号的忠实检索方面具有优势。神经计算属于自适应、并行和分布式(局部)信号处理的信息处理。在数据分析中,一个常见的任务是为后续处理和解释找到适当的多变量数据子空间。线性变换由于其计算和概念上的简单性,经常用于数据模型选择。一些常见的线性变换是PCA,因子分析(FA),投影追踪(PP),以及最近的ICA (common, 1994)。后者作为非线性主成分分析(Hotelling, 1993)的扩展而出现,并在信号和阵列处理中的盲源分离(BSS) (Cardoso, 1998)的背景下发展起来。ICA也与最近的视觉脑理论有关(Barlow, 1991),该理论假设连续的处理步骤会导致表征冗余的逐步减少(Olshausen和Field, 1996)。这篇文章概述了PCA和ICA神经形态架构及其相关的算法实现,这些算法越来越多地被用作探索性技术。讨论了人工产生的亚高斯和超高斯源信号。背景
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信