Developments in the RICE asbestos fibre counting scheme, 1992-2000. Regular Interlaboratory Counting Exchanges.

P. Brown, Alan D. Jones, B. Miller
{"title":"Developments in the RICE asbestos fibre counting scheme, 1992-2000. Regular Interlaboratory Counting Exchanges.","authors":"P. Brown, Alan D. Jones, B. Miller","doi":"10.1093/ANNHYG/MEF033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK's Regular Interlaboratory Counting Exchanges (RICE) scheme provides proficiency testing for laboratories counting asbestos fibres by phase contrast optical microscopy, as in the method for measurement of airborne fibre concentrations. From 1984 to 1992, the scheme used circulations of industrial samples containing mostly chrysotile, and reference values were obtained from fibre counts by automated image analysis. In 1992, lower density (< 100 fibres/mm2) samples from asbestos clearance operations were added and the new reference values were medians of the laboratories' determinations. In extensive data from 28 recent rounds of sample exchanges, the new reference values are shown to be more reliable than the old. Average counting levels have changed, with different trends according to fibre density. In low density samples, after initial increases, the levels appear to have stabilized. Counting levels on the higher density samples show a continuing trend of approximately 0.5% decrease per round. Widening the density range may have reduced the influence of counters' preconceptions of what values are expected and so their counts on the reference samples may now better reflect their routine counting. The implications of these findings and of other new developments, such as expected new counting rules, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"46 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ANNHYG/MEF033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The UK's Regular Interlaboratory Counting Exchanges (RICE) scheme provides proficiency testing for laboratories counting asbestos fibres by phase contrast optical microscopy, as in the method for measurement of airborne fibre concentrations. From 1984 to 1992, the scheme used circulations of industrial samples containing mostly chrysotile, and reference values were obtained from fibre counts by automated image analysis. In 1992, lower density (< 100 fibres/mm2) samples from asbestos clearance operations were added and the new reference values were medians of the laboratories' determinations. In extensive data from 28 recent rounds of sample exchanges, the new reference values are shown to be more reliable than the old. Average counting levels have changed, with different trends according to fibre density. In low density samples, after initial increases, the levels appear to have stabilized. Counting levels on the higher density samples show a continuing trend of approximately 0.5% decrease per round. Widening the density range may have reduced the influence of counters' preconceptions of what values are expected and so their counts on the reference samples may now better reflect their routine counting. The implications of these findings and of other new developments, such as expected new counting rules, are discussed.
1992-2000年稻米石棉纤维计数计划的发展。定期实验室间计数交换。
英国的常规实验室间计数交换(RICE)计划为通过相衬光学显微镜计数石棉纤维的实验室提供熟练程度测试,就像测量空气中纤维浓度的方法一样。从1984年到1992年,该方案使用了主要含有温石棉的工业样品的循环,并通过自动图像分析从纤维计数中获得参考值。1992年,从石棉清除行动中增加了较低密度(< 100纤维/平方毫米)的样品,新的参考值是实验室测定的中位数。最近28轮抽样交换的大量数据表明,新的参考值比旧的参考值更可靠。平均计数水平已经改变,根据纤维密度有不同的趋势。在低密度样品中,在最初的增加之后,水平似乎已经稳定下来。高密度样本上的计数水平显示出每轮下降约0.5%的持续趋势。扩大密度范围可能减少了计数员对预期值的先入为主的观念的影响,因此他们对参考样本的计数现在可以更好地反映他们的常规计数。讨论了这些发现和其他新发展的含义,例如预期的新计数规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信