Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond

I. Koskinen, T. Binder, Johan Redström
{"title":"Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond","authors":"I. Koskinen, T. Binder, Johan Redström","doi":"10.1080/17493460802303333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last 10 years we have seen a growing number of researchers integrating design experiments in their research inquiries. Initially, this work borrowed heavily from neighboring fields, employing a dual strategy in which design experiments and their evaluation were largely treated as separate processes that were often carried out by different people. More recently, design researchers have developed several approaches that integrate design-specific work methods into research. This paper takes a methodological look at three such established approaches that the authors call Lab, Field, and Gallery. They are described and their similarities and differences analyzed. In conclusion, whether design research today needs foundations based on the standards established for other disciplines is discussed.","PeriodicalId":380141,"journal":{"name":"Artifact: Journal of Virtual Design","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artifact: Journal of Virtual Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460802303333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

Over the last 10 years we have seen a growing number of researchers integrating design experiments in their research inquiries. Initially, this work borrowed heavily from neighboring fields, employing a dual strategy in which design experiments and their evaluation were largely treated as separate processes that were often carried out by different people. More recently, design researchers have developed several approaches that integrate design-specific work methods into research. This paper takes a methodological look at three such established approaches that the authors call Lab, Field, and Gallery. They are described and their similarities and differences analyzed. In conclusion, whether design research today needs foundations based on the standards established for other disciplines is discussed.
实验室,现场,画廊,和超越
在过去的10年里,我们看到越来越多的研究人员在他们的研究中整合了设计实验。最初,这项工作大量借鉴了邻近领域,采用了双重策略,其中设计实验及其评估在很大程度上被视为独立的过程,通常由不同的人进行。最近,设计研究人员开发了几种方法,将特定于设计的工作方法整合到研究中。本文从方法论上考察了作者称之为实验室、现场和画廊的三种已建立的方法。对它们进行了描述,并分析了它们的异同。最后,讨论了今天的设计研究是否需要建立在其他学科标准基础上的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信