Predicting Daily Activities Effectiveness Using Base-level and Meta level Classifiers

Mohammed Akour, Shadi Banitaan, Hiba Alsghaier, Khalid Al Radaideh
{"title":"Predicting Daily Activities Effectiveness Using Base-level and Meta level Classifiers","authors":"Mohammed Akour, Shadi Banitaan, Hiba Alsghaier, Khalid Al Radaideh","doi":"10.1109/ISDFS.2019.8757487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collecting and analyzing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) could supplement elder care and long-term care services with very sensitive information about elder people and what they do during the day and what challenges they face. Providing care for elder people based on their ADL could let them live actively, independently and healthy. In this paper, we studied the effectiveness of base learners against ensemble methods for predicting ADL. The selected base learners are Naïve Bayes, Bayesian Network, Sequential Minimal Optimization, Decision Table and J48 while the selected ensemble learners are boosting, bagging, decorate and random forest. The dataset was gathered from a wearable accelerometer attached on the chest. The data used in this study is collected from fifteen participants conducting seven activities namely standing up, working at the computer, going up downstairs, standing, walking, walking and talking with someone and talking while standing, walking and going up downstairs. For base learners, J48 achieved the best results in terms of F-measure, precision and recall. Results also showed that Boosting using decision table as the base classifier achieved the best improvement over base classifier. In addition, Bagging was the only ensemble approach that improved the results using all classifiers as base learners. Moreover, Bagging was able to predict five activities out of seven more efficiently than the other approaches while the rotation forest approach was able to predict the remaining two activities more efficiently than the rest. The results also indicated that all approaches took a reasonable time to build the model except Decorate.","PeriodicalId":247412,"journal":{"name":"2019 7th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 7th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDFS.2019.8757487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Collecting and analyzing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) could supplement elder care and long-term care services with very sensitive information about elder people and what they do during the day and what challenges they face. Providing care for elder people based on their ADL could let them live actively, independently and healthy. In this paper, we studied the effectiveness of base learners against ensemble methods for predicting ADL. The selected base learners are Naïve Bayes, Bayesian Network, Sequential Minimal Optimization, Decision Table and J48 while the selected ensemble learners are boosting, bagging, decorate and random forest. The dataset was gathered from a wearable accelerometer attached on the chest. The data used in this study is collected from fifteen participants conducting seven activities namely standing up, working at the computer, going up downstairs, standing, walking, walking and talking with someone and talking while standing, walking and going up downstairs. For base learners, J48 achieved the best results in terms of F-measure, precision and recall. Results also showed that Boosting using decision table as the base classifier achieved the best improvement over base classifier. In addition, Bagging was the only ensemble approach that improved the results using all classifiers as base learners. Moreover, Bagging was able to predict five activities out of seven more efficiently than the other approaches while the rotation forest approach was able to predict the remaining two activities more efficiently than the rest. The results also indicated that all approaches took a reasonable time to build the model except Decorate.
使用基础级和元级分类器预测日常活动的有效性
收集和分析日常生活活动(Activities of Daily Living, ADL)可以为老年护理和长期护理服务提供非常敏感的信息,包括老年人的日常活动和面临的挑战。根据老年人的生活自理能力对其进行护理,可以使老年人积极、独立、健康地生活。在本文中,我们研究了基学习器对集成方法预测ADL的有效性。选择的基础学习器有Naïve贝叶斯、贝叶斯网络、顺序最小优化、决策表和J48,选择的集成学习器有boosting、bagging、装饰和随机森林。数据集是通过附着在胸部的可穿戴加速度计收集的。本研究中使用的数据是从15名参与者中收集的,他们进行了七种活动,分别是站立,在电脑前工作,下楼,站立,行走,行走和与人交谈以及站立时说话,行走和下楼。对于基础学习器,J48在F-measure、precision和recall方面取得了最好的成绩。结果还表明,使用决策表作为基分类器的Boosting比基分类器的改进效果最好。此外,Bagging是唯一一种使用所有分类器作为基础学习器来改善结果的集成方法。此外,套袋法能够比其他方法更有效地预测七项活动中的五项,而轮作林方法能够比其他方法更有效地预测其余两项活动。结果还表明,除了装饰之外,所有方法都需要合理的时间来构建模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信