Evaluation of English speaking proficiency under fixed speech rate: Focusing on utterances produced by Korean child learners of English*

Narah Choi, Tae-Yeoub Jang
{"title":"Evaluation of English speaking proficiency under fixed speech rate:\n Focusing on utterances produced by Korean child learners of English*","authors":"Narah Choi, Tae-Yeoub Jang","doi":"10.13064/ksss.2023.15.1.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempted to test the hypothesis that Korean evaluators can score L2 speech appropriately, even when speech rate features are unavailable. Two perception experiments ― preliminary and main ― were conducted sequentially. The purpose of the preliminary experiment was to categorize English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) speakers into two groups ― advanced learners and lower-level learners ― based on the proficiency scores given by five human raters. In the main experiment, a set of stimuli was prepared such that the speech rate of all data tokens was modified to have a uniform speech rate. Ten human evaluators were asked to score the stimulus tokens on a 5-point scale. These scores were statistically analyzed to determine whether there was a significant difference in utterance production between the two groups. The results of the preliminary experiment confirm that higher-proficiency learners speak faster than lower-proficiency learners. The results of the main experiment indicate that under controlled speech-rate conditions, human raters can appropriately assess learner proficiency, probably thanks to the linguistic features that the raters considered during the evaluation process.","PeriodicalId":255285,"journal":{"name":"Phonetics and Speech Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phonetics and Speech Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13064/ksss.2023.15.1.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study attempted to test the hypothesis that Korean evaluators can score L2 speech appropriately, even when speech rate features are unavailable. Two perception experiments ― preliminary and main ― were conducted sequentially. The purpose of the preliminary experiment was to categorize English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) speakers into two groups ― advanced learners and lower-level learners ― based on the proficiency scores given by five human raters. In the main experiment, a set of stimuli was prepared such that the speech rate of all data tokens was modified to have a uniform speech rate. Ten human evaluators were asked to score the stimulus tokens on a 5-point scale. These scores were statistically analyzed to determine whether there was a significant difference in utterance production between the two groups. The results of the preliminary experiment confirm that higher-proficiency learners speak faster than lower-proficiency learners. The results of the main experiment indicate that under controlled speech-rate conditions, human raters can appropriately assess learner proficiency, probably thanks to the linguistic features that the raters considered during the evaluation process.
固定语速下的英语口语能力评价:以韩国儿童英语学习者的话语为研究对象*
本研究试图验证韩语评估者在无法获得语音速率特征的情况下也能适当地对第二语言进行评分的假设。初步和主要两个知觉实验依次进行。初步实验的目的是根据五名人类评分员给出的熟练程度分数,将英语作为外语(EFL)的使用者分为两组——高级学习者和低级学习者。在主实验中,准备了一组刺激,对所有数据标记的语音速率进行了修改,使其具有统一的语音速率。10名人类评估员被要求以5分制对刺激标记进行评分。对这些评分进行统计分析,以确定两组之间的话语产生是否有显著差异。初步实验结果证实,高水平学习者比低水平学习者说得更快。主要实验结果表明,在控制语速的条件下,人类评分者可以适当地评估学习者的熟练程度,这可能要归功于评分者在评估过程中考虑的语言特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信