An Emancipationist Turn of Policy

Kristopher A. Teters
{"title":"An Emancipationist Turn of Policy","authors":"Kristopher A. Teters","doi":"10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469638867.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the second half of 1862, most Union officers in the West adopted more emancipationist policies. They routinely confiscated the slaves of rebels and employed many of them as scouts, spies, laborers, cooks, etc. This became the predominant policy across the several armies operating in the West. Official policy not only authorized confiscation but also made the practice more uniform. In July of 1862, Congress passed the Second Confiscation Act, which allowed for the seizure of any slaves belonging to rebels. At the same time, army commanders such as Samuel Curtis and Benjamin Butler began to realize how slaves could serve the Union army and the military necessity of taking them away from rebels, and developed pro-emancipationist policies and attitudes as a result. Though some radical officers, like John Phelps, were on a mission to eliminate slavery, Butler and many others were simply hard-nosed realists who shifted towards emancipationist policies out of military necessity. There remained conflict over the status of fugitive and confiscated states, mainly in border states like Kentucky and Missouri. Yet on the whole, by the end of 1862, Union armies were much more consistent and emancipationist in their policies.","PeriodicalId":184612,"journal":{"name":"Practical Liberators","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Liberators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469638867.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the second half of 1862, most Union officers in the West adopted more emancipationist policies. They routinely confiscated the slaves of rebels and employed many of them as scouts, spies, laborers, cooks, etc. This became the predominant policy across the several armies operating in the West. Official policy not only authorized confiscation but also made the practice more uniform. In July of 1862, Congress passed the Second Confiscation Act, which allowed for the seizure of any slaves belonging to rebels. At the same time, army commanders such as Samuel Curtis and Benjamin Butler began to realize how slaves could serve the Union army and the military necessity of taking them away from rebels, and developed pro-emancipationist policies and attitudes as a result. Though some radical officers, like John Phelps, were on a mission to eliminate slavery, Butler and many others were simply hard-nosed realists who shifted towards emancipationist policies out of military necessity. There remained conflict over the status of fugitive and confiscated states, mainly in border states like Kentucky and Missouri. Yet on the whole, by the end of 1862, Union armies were much more consistent and emancipationist in their policies.
政策的解放主义转向
在1862年下半年,西部的大多数联邦官员采取了更多的解放主义政策。他们经常没收叛军的奴隶,并雇佣他们中的许多人作为侦察兵、间谍、劳工、厨师等。这成为在西方作战的几支军队的主要政策。官方政策不仅授权没收,而且使这种做法更加统一。1862年7月,国会通过了第二次没收法案,允许没收任何属于叛军的奴隶。与此同时,像塞缪尔·柯蒂斯和本杰明·巴特勒这样的军队指挥官开始意识到奴隶如何为联邦军队服务,以及从叛军手中夺走奴隶的军事必要性,并因此制定了支持解放主义的政策和态度。虽然一些激进的军官,如约翰·菲尔普斯,是为了消灭奴隶制,但巴特勒和其他许多人只是精明的现实主义者,出于军事需要转向了解放主义政策。在逃亡州和被没收州的地位问题上仍然存在冲突,主要是在肯塔基州和密苏里州等边境州。但总的来说,到1862年底,联邦军队在政策上更加一致和解放主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信