Macroeconomic, Political and Institutional Factors of Economic Growth

O. Zhorayev, H. He
{"title":"Macroeconomic, Political and Institutional Factors of Economic Growth","authors":"O. Zhorayev, H. He","doi":"10.51176/1997-9967-2022-2-190-205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   Broad theoretical and empirical literature discusses how economic development is affected by different economic, political, institutional, social, and other factors. The classic macroeconomic growth theory argues that poorer states must have higher rates of economic growth compared to more prosperous states due to the so-called ‘catch-up effect’. The concept of ‘institutional sclerosis’, suggested by Olson, claims that economic performance is worse in countries that have powerful interest groups. Some scholars suggest that economic growth is conditioned by ‘institutional coherence’ when one institution in a country promotes the efficiency of another. In this research, using regression analysis we estimate the effect of different factors on economic growth in 187 countries from 2001 to 2018. Our findings do not fully support Olson’s argument that economic decline in some countries was conditioned by the influence of interest groups. Our econometric results do not confirm the importance of the effectiveness of state governance and the quality of public policy. At the same time, the most robust result of our analysis is a statistically significant negative relationship between the level of a country’s initial economic development and its following medium- and long-term economic growth. This research contributes to the existing literature by testing Olson’s institutional sclerosis effect for the last two decade,; estimating the combined effect of interacted variables that explains predictions of both ‘interest groups’ and ‘varieties of capitalism’ theories; considering various macroeconomic and social factors along with political ones in one multivariate model.","PeriodicalId":262123,"journal":{"name":"Economics: the strategy and practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics: the strategy and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2022-2-190-205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Broad theoretical and empirical literature discusses how economic development is affected by different economic, political, institutional, social, and other factors. The classic macroeconomic growth theory argues that poorer states must have higher rates of economic growth compared to more prosperous states due to the so-called ‘catch-up effect’. The concept of ‘institutional sclerosis’, suggested by Olson, claims that economic performance is worse in countries that have powerful interest groups. Some scholars suggest that economic growth is conditioned by ‘institutional coherence’ when one institution in a country promotes the efficiency of another. In this research, using regression analysis we estimate the effect of different factors on economic growth in 187 countries from 2001 to 2018. Our findings do not fully support Olson’s argument that economic decline in some countries was conditioned by the influence of interest groups. Our econometric results do not confirm the importance of the effectiveness of state governance and the quality of public policy. At the same time, the most robust result of our analysis is a statistically significant negative relationship between the level of a country’s initial economic development and its following medium- and long-term economic growth. This research contributes to the existing literature by testing Olson’s institutional sclerosis effect for the last two decade,; estimating the combined effect of interacted variables that explains predictions of both ‘interest groups’ and ‘varieties of capitalism’ theories; considering various macroeconomic and social factors along with political ones in one multivariate model.
经济增长的宏观经济、政治和制度因素
广泛的理论和实证文献讨论了经济发展如何受到不同的经济、政治、制度、社会和其他因素的影响。经典的宏观经济增长理论认为,由于所谓的“追赶效应”,较贫穷的国家必须比较繁荣的国家有更高的经济增长率。奥尔森提出的“制度僵化”概念声称,在拥有强大利益集团的国家,经济表现更差。一些学者认为,当一个国家的一个机构促进另一个机构的效率时,经济增长受到“制度一致性”的制约。在本研究中,我们利用回归分析估计了不同因素对187个国家2001 - 2018年经济增长的影响。我们的研究结果并不完全支持奥尔森的观点,即一些国家的经济衰退是由利益集团的影响决定的。我们的计量经济学结果并没有证实国家治理的有效性和公共政策质量的重要性。与此同时,我们的分析最有力的结果是,一个国家最初的经济发展水平与其随后的中长期经济增长之间存在统计学上显著的负相关关系。本研究通过对过去二十年的Olson制度硬化效应进行检验,为现有文献做出了贡献;估计解释“利益集团”和“资本主义多样性”理论预测的相互作用变量的综合效应;在一个多元模型中考虑各种宏观经济和社会因素以及政治因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信