User-perceived availability and response-time in voting-based replicated systems: a case study

I. Chen, Ding-Chau Wang, Chih-Ping Chu
{"title":"User-perceived availability and response-time in voting-based replicated systems: a case study","authors":"I. Chen, Ding-Chau Wang, Chih-Ping Chu","doi":"10.1109/ASSET.1999.756758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we develop a modeling method based on stochastic Petri nets (SPN) to allow user-perceived measures in voting-based replicated systems to be estimated. The merit of our approach is that user-arrival, maintenance, and node/link-failure or -repair processes are fully decoupled, thus allowing us to remove some unnecessary modeling assumptions and also to keep track of states in which the system is unavailable to users from the user's perspective. We apply our method to contrast user-perceived availability and performance measures under dynamic and static voting algorithms in a 3-node, fully-connected network and discover that (a) for user-perceived availability, the conditions under which static voting is better than dynamic voting, or vice versa, are largely determined by the user workload; (b) for user-perceived response time, static voting is always better than dynamic voting. We give some physical interpretation of the analysis result. Our method is generic in nature and can be applied to analyzing other voting algorithms or network structures for replicated data management.","PeriodicalId":340666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Application-Specific Systems and Software Engineering and Technology. ASSET'99 (Cat. No.PR00122)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Application-Specific Systems and Software Engineering and Technology. ASSET'99 (Cat. No.PR00122)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASSET.1999.756758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a modeling method based on stochastic Petri nets (SPN) to allow user-perceived measures in voting-based replicated systems to be estimated. The merit of our approach is that user-arrival, maintenance, and node/link-failure or -repair processes are fully decoupled, thus allowing us to remove some unnecessary modeling assumptions and also to keep track of states in which the system is unavailable to users from the user's perspective. We apply our method to contrast user-perceived availability and performance measures under dynamic and static voting algorithms in a 3-node, fully-connected network and discover that (a) for user-perceived availability, the conditions under which static voting is better than dynamic voting, or vice versa, are largely determined by the user workload; (b) for user-perceived response time, static voting is always better than dynamic voting. We give some physical interpretation of the analysis result. Our method is generic in nature and can be applied to analyzing other voting algorithms or network structures for replicated data management.
基于投票的复制系统中用户感知的可用性和响应时间:一个案例研究
在本文中,我们开发了一种基于随机Petri网(SPN)的建模方法,允许在基于投票的复制系统中估计用户感知的度量。我们的方法的优点是,用户到达、维护和节点/链路故障或修复过程是完全解耦的,因此允许我们删除一些不必要的建模假设,并且从用户的角度跟踪系统不可用的状态。我们应用我们的方法在一个3节点、全连接网络中对比动态和静态投票算法下的用户感知可用性和性能指标,并发现(a)对于用户感知可用性,静态投票优于动态投票的条件,反之亦然,在很大程度上取决于用户工作负载;(b)对于用户感知的响应时间,静态投票总是优于动态投票。我们对分析结果作了一些物理解释。我们的方法本质上是通用的,可以应用于分析其他投票算法或复制数据管理的网络结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信