A Critical Review on The Job Creation Omnibus Law-Forming Process

Bobi Yusuf Noor Fajar, Zaid Zaid
{"title":"A Critical Review on The Job Creation Omnibus Law-Forming Process","authors":"Bobi Yusuf Noor Fajar, Zaid Zaid","doi":"10.24815/sklj.v5i2.21605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to conduct a critical study of the process of formulating the \"omnibus law\" on job creation from the perspective of legal politics and good governance through a normative method using a conceptual and statute approach and utilizing secondary and primary legal materials which are then critically analyzed through prescription. The results of this study ultimately conclude that from a legal political perspective, the process of forming this law is very problematic and procedurally flawed. In addition, this law is a response from policymakers who are political in nature to a complex situation which in fact creates complex derivative problems as well. This is inseparable from the nature of the omnibus law itself, which lacks democracy, participation, reduces accuracy and prudence in its preparation, and has the potential to exceed the provisions in the constitution. Therefore, based on the good governance point of view, the process of forming the Omnibus Law on Job Creation has not fulfilled the principles of good governance in the form of the principles of legitimacy, transparency, accountability, responsiveness, and the rule of law. The principles of effectiveness and efficiency in the principles of good governance in this Law can still be considered","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v5i2.21605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a critical study of the process of formulating the "omnibus law" on job creation from the perspective of legal politics and good governance through a normative method using a conceptual and statute approach and utilizing secondary and primary legal materials which are then critically analyzed through prescription. The results of this study ultimately conclude that from a legal political perspective, the process of forming this law is very problematic and procedurally flawed. In addition, this law is a response from policymakers who are political in nature to a complex situation which in fact creates complex derivative problems as well. This is inseparable from the nature of the omnibus law itself, which lacks democracy, participation, reduces accuracy and prudence in its preparation, and has the potential to exceed the provisions in the constitution. Therefore, based on the good governance point of view, the process of forming the Omnibus Law on Job Creation has not fulfilled the principles of good governance in the form of the principles of legitimacy, transparency, accountability, responsiveness, and the rule of law. The principles of effectiveness and efficiency in the principles of good governance in this Law can still be considered
就业创造综合法律形成过程述评
本研究旨在从法律政治和善治的角度,通过使用概念和法规方法的规范方法,并利用二手和初级法律材料,然后通过处方进行批判性分析,对制定创造就业的“综合法”的过程进行批判性研究。这项研究的结果最终得出结论,从法律政治的角度来看,这项法律的形成过程是非常有问题的,程序上有缺陷。此外,这项法律是政策制定者对复杂情况的回应,这些政策本质上是政治性的,实际上也造成了复杂的衍生问题。这与综合法本身的性质是分不开的,它缺乏民主和参与,在制定过程中降低了准确性和审慎性,并且有可能超出宪法的规定。因此,基于善治的观点,《创造就业综合法》的形成过程并没有以合法性、透明度、问责性、响应性和法治原则的形式实现善治原则。该法中善政原则中的效力和效率原则仍然可以加以考虑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信