A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa

A. Arslan, Kristin M. Floress, C. Lamanna, L. Lipper, T. Rosenstock
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"A. Arslan, Kristin M. Floress, C. Lamanna, L. Lipper, T. Rosenstock","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both global poverty and hunger have increased in recent years, endangering progress towards accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2. The regression has been most pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Meeting the SDG targets requires achieving resilient farm productivity. Although many farm management technologies exist to improve yields, farmers in SSA largely have not adopted these approaches. A long-standing literature about technology adoption identifies multiple hypotheses as to why farmers may or may not adopt new agricultural technologies, culminating in numerous micro-econometric studies. We analyse a metadata set capturing the findings of 164 published studies specifically focusing on SSA and show that 20 out of 38, or 53%, of the determinants commonly believed to influence technology adoption lack empirical support. Eighteen determinants—primarily related to information access, wealth, group membership and social capital, and land tenure—consistently influence adoption across studies. Wealth remains a significant determinant of fertilizer adoption, despite long-running subsidies in most countries, although it is decoupled from the adoption of improved seeds and alternative crop and nutrient management technologies. We highlight the foundational determinants of adoption and offer guidance to design effective interventions that can decrease poverty and hunger towards 2030.","PeriodicalId":384293,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Both global poverty and hunger have increased in recent years, endangering progress towards accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2. The regression has been most pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Meeting the SDG targets requires achieving resilient farm productivity. Although many farm management technologies exist to improve yields, farmers in SSA largely have not adopted these approaches. A long-standing literature about technology adoption identifies multiple hypotheses as to why farmers may or may not adopt new agricultural technologies, culminating in numerous micro-econometric studies. We analyse a metadata set capturing the findings of 164 published studies specifically focusing on SSA and show that 20 out of 38, or 53%, of the determinants commonly believed to influence technology adoption lack empirical support. Eighteen determinants—primarily related to information access, wealth, group membership and social capital, and land tenure—consistently influence adoption across studies. Wealth remains a significant determinant of fertilizer adoption, despite long-running subsidies in most countries, although it is decoupled from the adoption of improved seeds and alternative crop and nutrient management technologies. We highlight the foundational determinants of adoption and offer guidance to design effective interventions that can decrease poverty and hunger towards 2030.
撒哈拉以南非洲采用农业技术的荟萃分析
近年来,全球贫困和饥饿都有所增加,危及实现可持续发展目标1和2的进展。这种倒退在撒哈拉以南非洲最为明显。实现可持续发展目标的具体目标需要实现具有抵御力的农业生产力。虽然有许多农场管理技术可以提高产量,但SSA的农民基本上没有采用这些方法。关于技术采用的长期文献确定了多种假设,即为什么农民可能会或可能不会采用新的农业技术,最终在许多微观计量经济学研究中达到顶峰。我们分析了一个元数据集,其中包含164项专门关注SSA的已发表研究的结果,结果表明,在通常被认为影响技术采用的38个决定因素中,有20个(53%)缺乏实证支持。18个决定因素——主要与信息获取、财富、群体成员和社会资本以及土地所有权相关——在研究中始终影响着采用率。尽管大多数国家长期提供补贴,但财富仍然是肥料采用的一个重要决定因素,尽管它与采用改良种子和替代作物及养分管理技术脱钩。我们强调了收养的基本决定因素,并为设计有效的干预措施提供指导,从而在2030年前减少贫困和饥饿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信