The Laplace Mechanism has optimal utility for differential privacy over continuous queries

Natasha Fernandes, Annabelle McIver, Carroll Morgan
{"title":"The Laplace Mechanism has optimal utility for differential privacy over continuous queries","authors":"Natasha Fernandes, Annabelle McIver, Carroll Morgan","doi":"10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential Privacy protects individuals’ data when statistical queries are published from aggregated databases: applying \"obfuscating\" mechanisms to the query results makes the released information less specific but, unavoidably, also decreases its utility. Yet it has been shown that for discrete data (e.g. counting queries), a mandated degree of privacy and a reasonable interpretation of loss of utility, the Geometric obfuscating mechanism is optimal: it loses as little utility as possible [Ghosh et al. [1]].For continuous query results however (e.g. real numbers) the optimality result does not hold. Our contribution here is to show that optimality is regained by using the Laplace mechanism for the obfuscation.The technical apparatus involved includes the earlier discrete result [Ghosh op. cit.], recent work on abstract channels and their geometric representation as hyper-distributions [Alvim et al. [2]], and the dual interpretations of distance between distributions provided by the Kantorovich-Rubinstein Theorem.","PeriodicalId":174663,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Differential Privacy protects individuals’ data when statistical queries are published from aggregated databases: applying "obfuscating" mechanisms to the query results makes the released information less specific but, unavoidably, also decreases its utility. Yet it has been shown that for discrete data (e.g. counting queries), a mandated degree of privacy and a reasonable interpretation of loss of utility, the Geometric obfuscating mechanism is optimal: it loses as little utility as possible [Ghosh et al. [1]].For continuous query results however (e.g. real numbers) the optimality result does not hold. Our contribution here is to show that optimality is regained by using the Laplace mechanism for the obfuscation.The technical apparatus involved includes the earlier discrete result [Ghosh op. cit.], recent work on abstract channels and their geometric representation as hyper-distributions [Alvim et al. [2]], and the dual interpretations of distance between distributions provided by the Kantorovich-Rubinstein Theorem.
拉普拉斯机制对于连续查询的差分隐私具有最佳效用
当从聚合数据库发布统计查询时,差异隐私保护个人数据:对查询结果应用“混淆”机制使发布的信息不那么具体,但也不可避免地降低了其效用。然而,已经证明,对于离散数据(例如计数查询),强制程度的隐私和对效用损失的合理解释,几何混淆机制是最佳的:它损失的效用尽可能少[Ghosh等人[1]]。然而,对于连续查询结果(例如实数),最优性结果不成立。我们在这里的贡献是表明,通过使用拉普拉斯机制进行混淆,可以重新获得最优性。所涉及的技术设备包括早期的离散结果[Ghosh等人同上],最近关于抽象通道及其作为超分布的几何表示的工作[Alvim等人[2]],以及由Kantorovich-Rubinstein定理提供的分布之间距离的对偶解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信