Origins of State and Legal Ideas of Russian Freemasons in the Late 18th – First Half of the 19th Century

A. Dmitriyev
{"title":"Origins of State and Legal Ideas of Russian Freemasons in the Late 18th – First Half of the 19th Century","authors":"A. Dmitriyev","doi":"10.35853/ufh-rmp-2019-l07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was triggered by the opinions spreading in the contemporary \nacademic literature, according to which the ideology of Russian freemasonry \nwas associated with constitutionalism and Order of Illuminati, and the theory of \npublic welfare was a formal rationale for the monarch’s unlimited power. The \nmain goal of this research is analyzing the public welfare concepts in the teachings \nof Russian and foreign thinkers, as well as in provisions of acts and writings of \nRussian freemasons. The author uses methods of the history of notions and the \nintellectual history to analyze the links between F. Prokopovich’s, S. Pufendorf’s, \nV. N. Tatishchev’s, Y. F. Bilfeld’s and I. G. Justi’s ideas and provisions of freemasons’ \ncharters and writings by Russian freemasons – A. P. Sumarokov, \nI. V. Lopukhin, I. A. Pozdeyev. The author’s core findings were as follows: public \nwelfare is mostly understood as a merging of wills achievable on condition of \nrealizing everyone’s welfare. The concept of public welfare includes the principle \nof a limited union between the authorities and the society, as well as the principle of \nfulfilling mutual obligations by the monarch and citizens (subjects), failing which \nthe morals decline and the state falls. The study’s main conclusions illustrate that \nRussian freemasons adopted theoretical constructs of public welfare, mutual \nobligations of the monarch and the subjects (citizens), and the moral nature of will. \nRussian freemasons developed these ideas in their own works, interpreting them \nmainly in the conservative and protective vein. The political ideal of the Russian \nfreemasonry is a single and indelible limited monarchy headed by an enlightened \nmonarch whose authority of governing the civil society is limited by the natural law \nand the law of God.","PeriodicalId":286196,"journal":{"name":"Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019)","volume":"90 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35853/ufh-rmp-2019-l07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research was triggered by the opinions spreading in the contemporary academic literature, according to which the ideology of Russian freemasonry was associated with constitutionalism and Order of Illuminati, and the theory of public welfare was a formal rationale for the monarch’s unlimited power. The main goal of this research is analyzing the public welfare concepts in the teachings of Russian and foreign thinkers, as well as in provisions of acts and writings of Russian freemasons. The author uses methods of the history of notions and the intellectual history to analyze the links between F. Prokopovich’s, S. Pufendorf’s, V. N. Tatishchev’s, Y. F. Bilfeld’s and I. G. Justi’s ideas and provisions of freemasons’ charters and writings by Russian freemasons – A. P. Sumarokov, I. V. Lopukhin, I. A. Pozdeyev. The author’s core findings were as follows: public welfare is mostly understood as a merging of wills achievable on condition of realizing everyone’s welfare. The concept of public welfare includes the principle of a limited union between the authorities and the society, as well as the principle of fulfilling mutual obligations by the monarch and citizens (subjects), failing which the morals decline and the state falls. The study’s main conclusions illustrate that Russian freemasons adopted theoretical constructs of public welfare, mutual obligations of the monarch and the subjects (citizens), and the moral nature of will. Russian freemasons developed these ideas in their own works, interpreting them mainly in the conservative and protective vein. The political ideal of the Russian freemasonry is a single and indelible limited monarchy headed by an enlightened monarch whose authority of governing the civil society is limited by the natural law and the law of God.
18世纪末至19世纪上半叶俄国共济会的国家起源与法律思想
这一研究是由当时学术文献中流传的观点引发的,根据这些观点,俄罗斯共济会的意识形态与宪政主义和光明会联系在一起,公共福利理论是君主无限权力的形式理由。本研究的主要目的是分析俄罗斯和外国思想家的教义以及俄罗斯共济会的行为和著作规定中的公益概念。作者运用观念史和思想史的方法,分析了F. Prokopovich、S. Pufendorf、V. N. Tatishchev、Y. F. Bilfeld和I. G. Justi的思想与俄国共济会会员A. P. Sumarokov、I. V. Lopukhin、I. A. Pozdeyev的共济会章程和著作的规定之间的联系。作者的核心发现是:公共福利主要被理解为在实现每个人的福利的条件下可以实现的意志的合并。公共福利的概念包括权力与社会有限联合的原则,以及君主与公民(臣民)履行相互义务的原则,否则道德就会衰落,国家就会灭亡。本研究的主要结论表明,俄罗斯共济会采用了公共福利、君主与臣民(公民)的相互义务以及意志的道德本质的理论建构。俄罗斯的共济会成员在他们自己的作品中发展了这些思想,主要以保守和保护的方式来解释它们。俄罗斯共济会的政治理想是一个单一的、不可磨灭的有限君主制,由一个开明的君主领导,他统治公民社会的权威受到自然法则和上帝法则的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书