{"title":"EXCAVATIONS OF V. A. BOHUSEVYCH IN CHERNIHIV IN 1947 AND 1949","authors":"Yu. M. Sytyi","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The excavations of V. A. Bohusevych in Chernihiv in 1947 and 1949 are analyzed in the paper. In the first year, the work was carried out on the terrace of the Desna River — on the Сitadel (the Dytynets), Okolny Grad and near the Eletsky Monastery. On the Сitadel V. A. Bohusevych looked for the remains of a barrow cemetery and did not watch the pits of buildings deepened into earth. In 1949, the expedition managed to explore the pits of the buildings not only on the Citadel (as it was in 1947) but also on other areas in its eastern part. Works were widely carried out in the Okolny Grad which allowed to obtain materials about the planning of this part of the city outscirt. Excavations have been carried out near the Eletsky Monastery. The results of different years of research allow us to compare them and draw the conclusion — in the process of expedition participants gained some archaeological experience, began understand better the structure of the cultural layer and filling the pits of buildings. The shortcomings in the work of the head of expedition can be explained by the lack of archaeological experience in working with the «dry» cultural layer. Before the war, V. A. Bohusevych worked in Pskov and Novgorod and dealt with «wet» cultural layers and the remains of land structures. \nEach archeological site has its own characteristics and each researcher, starting the work, develops the methods, learns to understand these features and enriches his experience in the research process. In archeology there are no direct ways to accumulate new knowledge. New materials refute false theories, and their verification allows us to increase our understanding of the development of various parts of Chernihiv, to open new pages in its history. \nThe first years of research by V. A. Bohusevych in Ukraine were this very period of accumulation of new knowledge, which he lacked due to low-quality training caused by poor state of archaeological science in the prewar period.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The excavations of V. A. Bohusevych in Chernihiv in 1947 and 1949 are analyzed in the paper. In the first year, the work was carried out on the terrace of the Desna River — on the Сitadel (the Dytynets), Okolny Grad and near the Eletsky Monastery. On the Сitadel V. A. Bohusevych looked for the remains of a barrow cemetery and did not watch the pits of buildings deepened into earth. In 1949, the expedition managed to explore the pits of the buildings not only on the Citadel (as it was in 1947) but also on other areas in its eastern part. Works were widely carried out in the Okolny Grad which allowed to obtain materials about the planning of this part of the city outscirt. Excavations have been carried out near the Eletsky Monastery. The results of different years of research allow us to compare them and draw the conclusion — in the process of expedition participants gained some archaeological experience, began understand better the structure of the cultural layer and filling the pits of buildings. The shortcomings in the work of the head of expedition can be explained by the lack of archaeological experience in working with the «dry» cultural layer. Before the war, V. A. Bohusevych worked in Pskov and Novgorod and dealt with «wet» cultural layers and the remains of land structures.
Each archeological site has its own characteristics and each researcher, starting the work, develops the methods, learns to understand these features and enriches his experience in the research process. In archeology there are no direct ways to accumulate new knowledge. New materials refute false theories, and their verification allows us to increase our understanding of the development of various parts of Chernihiv, to open new pages in its history.
The first years of research by V. A. Bohusevych in Ukraine were this very period of accumulation of new knowledge, which he lacked due to low-quality training caused by poor state of archaeological science in the prewar period.
本文分析了1947年和1949年在切尔尼耶夫出土的V. A. Bohusevych的遗物。在第一年,这项工作是在Desna河的露台上进行的-在Сitadel (Dytynets), Okolny Grad和Eletsky修道院附近。在Сitadel上,v·a·博胡塞维奇寻找墓冢墓地的遗迹,并没有看到建筑物的凹坑深入地下。1949年,探险队不仅在城堡上(就像1947年一样),而且在城堡东部的其他地区也成功地探索了建筑的坑。工程在Okolny Grad广泛开展,可以获得有关城市郊区这部分规划的材料。在埃列茨基修道院附近进行了挖掘工作。不同年份的研究结果让我们可以对它们进行比较,并得出结论——在探险的过程中,参与者获得了一些考古经验,开始更好地了解文化层的结构和填充建筑的坑。探险队队长在工作中的缺点可以解释为缺乏与“干”文化层打交道的考古经验。战前,V. A. Bohusevych在普斯科夫和诺夫哥罗德工作,处理“湿”文化层和土地结构的遗迹。每一个考古遗址都有自己的特点,每一个研究人员在开始工作的时候,都会发展自己的方法,学会理解这些特点,在研究过程中丰富自己的经验。在考古学中没有积累新知识的直接途径。新材料驳斥了错误的理论,它们的验证使我们能够增加对切尔尼戈夫各个部分发展的理解,在其历史上翻开新的一页。V. A. Bohusevych在乌克兰进行研究的头几年正是他积累新知识的时期,而战前考古科学状况不佳导致的低质量训练使他缺乏新知识的积累。