To See or Not To See: Determining the Recognition Threshold of Encrypted Images

H. Hofbauer, F. Autrusseau, A. Uhl
{"title":"To See or Not To See: Determining the Recognition Threshold of Encrypted Images","authors":"H. Hofbauer, F. Autrusseau, A. Uhl","doi":"10.1109/EUVIP.2018.8611779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are numerous standards and recommendations when it comes to the acquisition of visual quality assessment from human observers. The recommendations deal with clearly visible images and try to keep the just-noticeable-difference between quality steps as small as possible to facilitate an exact measurement of image differences. When it comes to the assessment of selective encryption schemes the question is the opposite. The quality is not really of interest, the question is rather if the content of the images is discernible at all. There are no recommendations in literature for this kind of task. In this paper we will outline different protocols and setups, test them and form a recommendation for the acquisition of the recognition threshold for encrypted images from human observers.","PeriodicalId":252212,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUVIP.2018.8611779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are numerous standards and recommendations when it comes to the acquisition of visual quality assessment from human observers. The recommendations deal with clearly visible images and try to keep the just-noticeable-difference between quality steps as small as possible to facilitate an exact measurement of image differences. When it comes to the assessment of selective encryption schemes the question is the opposite. The quality is not really of interest, the question is rather if the content of the images is discernible at all. There are no recommendations in literature for this kind of task. In this paper we will outline different protocols and setups, test them and form a recommendation for the acquisition of the recognition threshold for encrypted images from human observers.
看还是不看:确定加密图像的识别阈值
当涉及到从人类观察者那里获得视觉质量评估时,有许多标准和建议。这些建议处理清晰可见的图像,并尽量保持质量步骤之间的差异尽可能小,以方便精确测量图像差异。当涉及到选择性加密方案的评估时,问题正好相反。质量并不是我们真正感兴趣的,问题是图像的内容是否清晰可辨。文献中没有关于这类任务的建议。在本文中,我们将概述不同的协议和设置,测试它们并形成从人类观察者处获取加密图像的识别阈值的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信