Experimental designs to model along-strike fault interaction

J. L. Calvez, B. Vendeville
{"title":"Experimental designs to model along-strike fault interaction","authors":"J. L. Calvez, B. Vendeville","doi":"10.3809/JVIRTEX.2002.00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revised: 8 August 2002Abstract We review the different designs and results of various previous models simulating the along-strikeinteraction between laterally offset faults, focusing on the formation of pull-apart basins in between strike-slipfaults or relay zones located between laterally offset normal faults.The design of most models traditionally includes the use of a basal sheet, whose edge acts as a velocitydiscontinuity onto which faults nucleate (Faugere and Brun, 1984; McClay and Ellis, 1987; Vendeville, 1991).One drawback of such design is that the location and orientation of faults in the relay zone are conditioned bythe shape of the edge of the basal sheet. An improved version of this design by Sims et al. (1999) using a strongviscous basal layer also forces faults to follow the basal velocity discontinuity. Using a third design by LeCalvez and Vendeville (1996), faults can freely propagate above a thin, weak viscous layer but fault blockscannot subside or rotate in response to deformation. We introduce a new design in which although fault locationis controlled by small instabilities at the brittle-ductile interface, faults can freely propagate along strike afterthey have nucleated. This design also allows fault blocks to subside, rise, or rotate in response to deformation.The main advantage of such design is that it forces the faults to form at a predetermined location. The ridgesare high enough (about one 20th of the brittle-layer thickness) to act as instabilities that trigger the nucleationof the main two faults, which thereby form with an initial lateral offset. But the ridges are low enough so that,once faults have formed in the brittle layer the fault planes act as dominant instabilities and freely propagatealong strike. Because this design provides much more freedom for fault interaction within the relay zone andfor fault-block rotation, results significantly differ from those of previous models.","PeriodicalId":201383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Virtual Explorer","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Virtual Explorer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3809/JVIRTEX.2002.00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Revised: 8 August 2002Abstract We review the different designs and results of various previous models simulating the along-strikeinteraction between laterally offset faults, focusing on the formation of pull-apart basins in between strike-slipfaults or relay zones located between laterally offset normal faults.The design of most models traditionally includes the use of a basal sheet, whose edge acts as a velocitydiscontinuity onto which faults nucleate (Faugere and Brun, 1984; McClay and Ellis, 1987; Vendeville, 1991).One drawback of such design is that the location and orientation of faults in the relay zone are conditioned bythe shape of the edge of the basal sheet. An improved version of this design by Sims et al. (1999) using a strongviscous basal layer also forces faults to follow the basal velocity discontinuity. Using a third design by LeCalvez and Vendeville (1996), faults can freely propagate above a thin, weak viscous layer but fault blockscannot subside or rotate in response to deformation. We introduce a new design in which although fault locationis controlled by small instabilities at the brittle-ductile interface, faults can freely propagate along strike afterthey have nucleated. This design also allows fault blocks to subside, rise, or rotate in response to deformation.The main advantage of such design is that it forces the faults to form at a predetermined location. The ridgesare high enough (about one 20th of the brittle-layer thickness) to act as instabilities that trigger the nucleationof the main two faults, which thereby form with an initial lateral offset. But the ridges are low enough so that,once faults have formed in the brittle layer the fault planes act as dominant instabilities and freely propagatealong strike. Because this design provides much more freedom for fault interaction within the relay zone andfor fault-block rotation, results significantly differ from those of previous models.
模拟沿走向断层相互作用的实验设计
摘要回顾了以往各种模拟横向偏移断层沿走行相互作用的模型的不同设计和结果,重点研究了在走滑断层之间或位于横向偏移正断层之间的中继带中拉分盆地的形成。大多数模型的设计传统上包括使用基板,其边缘作为断层形成的速度不连续面(Faugere和Brun, 1984;McClay and Ellis, 1987;Vendeville, 1991)。这种设计的一个缺点是,继电区内断层的位置和方向是由基片边缘的形状决定的。Sims等人(1999)利用强粘性基底层对这种设计进行了改进,也迫使断层遵循基底速度不连续。采用LeCalvez和Vendeville(1996)的第三种设计,断层可以在薄而弱的粘性层上自由传播,但断层块不会因变形而沉降或旋转。我们引入了一种新的设计,在这种设计中,虽然断层的位置是由脆性-韧性界面上的小不稳定性控制的,但断层在成核后可以沿走向自由传播。这种设计还允许断层块根据变形而下沉、上升或旋转。这种设计的主要优点是它迫使断层在预定的位置形成。这些隆起的高度(约为脆性层厚度的二十分之一)足以作为不稳定因素,触发两个主要断层的成核,从而形成最初的横向偏移。但是,这些隆起的高度足够低,因此,一旦断层在脆性层中形成,断层面就会成为主要的不稳定因素,并沿走向自由传播。由于这种设计为继电区内的故障相互作用和故障块旋转提供了更大的自由度,因此结果与以前的模型有很大的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信