{"title":"Experimental designs to model along-strike fault interaction","authors":"J. L. Calvez, B. Vendeville","doi":"10.3809/JVIRTEX.2002.00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revised: 8 August 2002Abstract We review the different designs and results of various previous models simulating the along-strikeinteraction between laterally offset faults, focusing on the formation of pull-apart basins in between strike-slipfaults or relay zones located between laterally offset normal faults.The design of most models traditionally includes the use of a basal sheet, whose edge acts as a velocitydiscontinuity onto which faults nucleate (Faugere and Brun, 1984; McClay and Ellis, 1987; Vendeville, 1991).One drawback of such design is that the location and orientation of faults in the relay zone are conditioned bythe shape of the edge of the basal sheet. An improved version of this design by Sims et al. (1999) using a strongviscous basal layer also forces faults to follow the basal velocity discontinuity. Using a third design by LeCalvez and Vendeville (1996), faults can freely propagate above a thin, weak viscous layer but fault blockscannot subside or rotate in response to deformation. We introduce a new design in which although fault locationis controlled by small instabilities at the brittle-ductile interface, faults can freely propagate along strike afterthey have nucleated. This design also allows fault blocks to subside, rise, or rotate in response to deformation.The main advantage of such design is that it forces the faults to form at a predetermined location. The ridgesare high enough (about one 20th of the brittle-layer thickness) to act as instabilities that trigger the nucleationof the main two faults, which thereby form with an initial lateral offset. But the ridges are low enough so that,once faults have formed in the brittle layer the fault planes act as dominant instabilities and freely propagatealong strike. Because this design provides much more freedom for fault interaction within the relay zone andfor fault-block rotation, results significantly differ from those of previous models.","PeriodicalId":201383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Virtual Explorer","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Virtual Explorer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3809/JVIRTEX.2002.00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
Abstract
Revised: 8 August 2002Abstract We review the different designs and results of various previous models simulating the along-strikeinteraction between laterally offset faults, focusing on the formation of pull-apart basins in between strike-slipfaults or relay zones located between laterally offset normal faults.The design of most models traditionally includes the use of a basal sheet, whose edge acts as a velocitydiscontinuity onto which faults nucleate (Faugere and Brun, 1984; McClay and Ellis, 1987; Vendeville, 1991).One drawback of such design is that the location and orientation of faults in the relay zone are conditioned bythe shape of the edge of the basal sheet. An improved version of this design by Sims et al. (1999) using a strongviscous basal layer also forces faults to follow the basal velocity discontinuity. Using a third design by LeCalvez and Vendeville (1996), faults can freely propagate above a thin, weak viscous layer but fault blockscannot subside or rotate in response to deformation. We introduce a new design in which although fault locationis controlled by small instabilities at the brittle-ductile interface, faults can freely propagate along strike afterthey have nucleated. This design also allows fault blocks to subside, rise, or rotate in response to deformation.The main advantage of such design is that it forces the faults to form at a predetermined location. The ridgesare high enough (about one 20th of the brittle-layer thickness) to act as instabilities that trigger the nucleationof the main two faults, which thereby form with an initial lateral offset. But the ridges are low enough so that,once faults have formed in the brittle layer the fault planes act as dominant instabilities and freely propagatealong strike. Because this design provides much more freedom for fault interaction within the relay zone andfor fault-block rotation, results significantly differ from those of previous models.