A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 2-Tests Performed Inside the Mask.

R. Mogridge, P. Stacey, James Forder
{"title":"A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 2-Tests Performed Inside the Mask.","authors":"R. Mogridge, P. Stacey, James Forder","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mew051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the second in a series of two describing the performance of a miniature and low-weight respirable sampler designed to fit inside filtering facepiece (FFP) and half-mask type respirators. The first paper described the design of the miniature sampler and evaluated the particle and collection performance of the miniature sampler. This paper assesses its comparability with the traditional inward leakage measurement technique, and its safe use. Simultaneous mass measurements of a respirable sodium chloride aerosol were taken inside a total inward leakage chamber by a miniature sampler and by sodium flame photometry. Direct side-by-side comparison of the two methods yielded excellent correlation (R 2 = 0.99), as did comparison when sampling from inside four different masks when worn by a breathing Sheffield dummy head. In addition, comparison tests were carried out using three models of FFP worn by human volunteers both with and without the miniature sampler, in order to test whether or not the presence of the miniature sampler negatively affected the protection offered. The difference between the tests carried out with the miniature sampler and without the miniature sampler was not statistically significant (P = 0.3). In all cases, the masks performed within their protection class, whether the miniature sampler was fitted or not. We therefore conclude that the miniature sampler does not significantly affect the protection offered by the masks. The miniature sampler may prove a viable option for in-mask measurements of respirable dust where low air concentrations of hazardous material are expected.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"60 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper is the second in a series of two describing the performance of a miniature and low-weight respirable sampler designed to fit inside filtering facepiece (FFP) and half-mask type respirators. The first paper described the design of the miniature sampler and evaluated the particle and collection performance of the miniature sampler. This paper assesses its comparability with the traditional inward leakage measurement technique, and its safe use. Simultaneous mass measurements of a respirable sodium chloride aerosol were taken inside a total inward leakage chamber by a miniature sampler and by sodium flame photometry. Direct side-by-side comparison of the two methods yielded excellent correlation (R 2 = 0.99), as did comparison when sampling from inside four different masks when worn by a breathing Sheffield dummy head. In addition, comparison tests were carried out using three models of FFP worn by human volunteers both with and without the miniature sampler, in order to test whether or not the presence of the miniature sampler negatively affected the protection offered. The difference between the tests carried out with the miniature sampler and without the miniature sampler was not statistically significant (P = 0.3). In all cases, the masks performed within their protection class, whether the miniature sampler was fitted or not. We therefore conclude that the miniature sampler does not significantly affect the protection offered by the masks. The miniature sampler may prove a viable option for in-mask measurements of respirable dust where low air concentrations of hazardous material are expected.
用于面罩内采样的新型微型呼吸采样器:第2部分-面罩内进行的测试
本文是系列两篇文章中的第二篇,描述了一种微型低重量呼吸采样器的性能,该采样器设计用于过滤式面罩(FFP)和半面罩式呼吸器。本文首先介绍了微型采样器的设计,并对微型采样器的颗粒和采集性能进行了评价。本文对其与传统内漏测量技术的可比性和安全性进行了评价。通过微型采样器和钠火焰光度法,在全向内泄漏室内对可吸入氯化钠气溶胶进行了同时质量测量。两种方法的直接并排比较产生了极好的相关性(r2 = 0.99),当戴着呼吸式谢菲尔德假人头时,从四个不同的口罩内采样时的比较也是如此。此外,使用人类志愿者佩戴和不佩戴微型采样器的三种FFP模型进行了比较测试,以测试微型采样器的存在是否会对所提供的保护产生负面影响。使用微型采样器和不使用微型采样器进行的测试之间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.3)。在所有情况下,无论微型采样器是否安装,口罩都在其保护等级内执行。因此,我们得出结论,微型采样器不会显著影响口罩提供的保护。在空气中有害物质浓度较低的情况下,微型采样器可能是口罩内呼吸性粉尘测量的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信