Investigating Bugs in AI-Infused Systems: Analysis and Proposed Taxonomy

M. Kassab, J. Defranco, P. Laplante
{"title":"Investigating Bugs in AI-Infused Systems: Analysis and Proposed Taxonomy","authors":"M. Kassab, J. Defranco, P. Laplante","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing for critical AI systems is non-trivial as these systems are prone to a new breed of sophisticated software defects. The admissibility of these systems and their fundamental social acceptance is tightly coupled with assuring whether the potential hazards to humans, animals, and property posed by the prospect defects can be minimized and limited to an acceptable level. In this work, we address the problem of assurance for critical AI systems by firstly, analyzing the nature of defects that occur in AI -infused systems in general and how to combat these within a testing strategy. Secondly, developing a focused taxon-omy of prospect defects in critical AI systems. This taxonomy enables the development of the non-critical proxy (i.e., stand-in) equivalent by reproducing defects with similar characteristics.","PeriodicalId":178302,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Testing for critical AI systems is non-trivial as these systems are prone to a new breed of sophisticated software defects. The admissibility of these systems and their fundamental social acceptance is tightly coupled with assuring whether the potential hazards to humans, animals, and property posed by the prospect defects can be minimized and limited to an acceptable level. In this work, we address the problem of assurance for critical AI systems by firstly, analyzing the nature of defects that occur in AI -infused systems in general and how to combat these within a testing strategy. Secondly, developing a focused taxon-omy of prospect defects in critical AI systems. This taxonomy enables the development of the non-critical proxy (i.e., stand-in) equivalent by reproducing defects with similar characteristics.
对关键的人工智能系统进行测试是非常重要的,因为这些系统很容易出现新的复杂软件缺陷。这些系统的可接受性及其基本的社会接受度与确保是否可以将潜在缺陷对人类、动物和财产造成的潜在危害降至最低并将其限制在可接受的水平密切相关。在这项工作中,我们解决了关键人工智能系统的保证问题,首先,分析了人工智能注入系统中通常出现的缺陷的性质,以及如何在测试策略中解决这些问题。其次,对关键人工智能系统的潜在缺陷进行重点分类。这种分类法允许通过再现具有相似特征的缺陷来开发非关键代理(即,替代)等同物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信