Getting more from requirements traceability: Requirements testing progress

Celal Ziftci, Ingolf Krüger
{"title":"Getting more from requirements traceability: Requirements testing progress","authors":"Celal Ziftci, Ingolf Krüger","doi":"10.1109/TEFSE.2013.6620148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements Engineering (RE) and Testing are important steps in many software development processes. It is critical to monitor the progress of the testing phase to allocate resources (person-power, time, computational resources) properly, and to make sure the prioritization of requirements are reflected during testing, i.e. more critical requirements are given higher priority and tested well. In this paper, we propose a new metric to help stakeholders monitor the progress of the testing phase from a requirements perspective, i.e. which requirements are tested adequately, and which ones insufficiently. Unlike existing progress related metrics, such as code coverage and MC/DC (modified condition/decision) coverage, this metric is on the requirements level, not source code level. We propose to automatically reverse engineer this metric from the existing test cases of a system. We also propose a method to evaluate this metric, and report the results of three case studies. On these case studies, our technique obtains results within 75.23% - 91.11% of the baseline on average.","PeriodicalId":330587,"journal":{"name":"2013 7th International Workshop on Traceability in Emerging Forms of Software Engineering (TEFSE)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 7th International Workshop on Traceability in Emerging Forms of Software Engineering (TEFSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEFSE.2013.6620148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Requirements Engineering (RE) and Testing are important steps in many software development processes. It is critical to monitor the progress of the testing phase to allocate resources (person-power, time, computational resources) properly, and to make sure the prioritization of requirements are reflected during testing, i.e. more critical requirements are given higher priority and tested well. In this paper, we propose a new metric to help stakeholders monitor the progress of the testing phase from a requirements perspective, i.e. which requirements are tested adequately, and which ones insufficiently. Unlike existing progress related metrics, such as code coverage and MC/DC (modified condition/decision) coverage, this metric is on the requirements level, not source code level. We propose to automatically reverse engineer this metric from the existing test cases of a system. We also propose a method to evaluate this metric, and report the results of three case studies. On these case studies, our technique obtains results within 75.23% - 91.11% of the baseline on average.
从需求跟踪中获得更多:需求测试进度
需求工程(RE)和测试是许多软件开发过程中的重要步骤。监控测试阶段的进度以适当地分配资源(人力、时间、计算资源),并确保需求的优先级在测试期间得到反映是至关重要的,也就是说,更关键的需求被赋予更高的优先级并得到很好的测试。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的度量来帮助涉众从需求的角度监视测试阶段的进展,也就是说,哪些需求得到了充分的测试,哪些需求没有得到充分的测试。不像现有的进度相关的度量,比如代码覆盖率和MC/DC(修改条件/决策)覆盖率,这个度量是在需求级别,而不是源代码级别。我们建议从系统的现有测试用例中自动地对这个度量进行逆向工程。我们还提出了一种评估这一指标的方法,并报告了三个案例研究的结果。在这些案例研究中,我们的技术获得的结果平均在基线的75.23% - 91.11%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信