Anne-Gabrielle Mittaz Hager, E. Brison, Guillaume Callias
{"title":"La réalité virtuelle et l'imagerie motrice dans le contrôle moteur des amuptés du membre supérieur: une révue de la littérature","authors":"Anne-Gabrielle Mittaz Hager, E. Brison, Guillaume Callias","doi":"10.4414/SMI.29.284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Motor imagery (MI) and virtual reality (VR) are used in the upper limb amputee’s (ULA) rehabilitation. ULAs using an advanced technical prosthesis are more and more numerous. Our aim was to better understand the motor working of ULAs, wearing prosthesis and using MI and VR. Method: A systematic research using Pubmed, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PSYCHINFO was conducted to analyse the consequences of such therapies on myoelectric and cerebral activities, motor performance and subjective data related to movement. Inclusion criteria for articles were: motor control of ULAs practicing MI or VR was investigated. Exclusion criteria were: only healthy subjects were tested or other therapies except MI and VR were practiced. Results: Initial search provided 2,635 articles, in which 10 have been included in the analysis. ULAs and healthy subjects do not have the same neurological way of working when practicing MI or VR. The number of possible controlled movements and their accuracy are different. Some aspects, such as visual content of VR systems, may have an influence. If such therapies are interesting to be used for some ULAs, they have to be used as a supplement, but not as a substitute for classical therapies. Discussion: Supplemental search such as RCTs have to be conducted to provide strong evidences, that MI or VR are appropriate to be used for ULAs rehabilitation. MI and VR procedures have to be defined more clearly. These techniques must absolutely be tested with ULAs.","PeriodicalId":156842,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical informatics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4414/SMI.29.284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Motor imagery (MI) and virtual reality (VR) are used in the upper limb amputee’s (ULA) rehabilitation. ULAs using an advanced technical prosthesis are more and more numerous. Our aim was to better understand the motor working of ULAs, wearing prosthesis and using MI and VR. Method: A systematic research using Pubmed, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PSYCHINFO was conducted to analyse the consequences of such therapies on myoelectric and cerebral activities, motor performance and subjective data related to movement. Inclusion criteria for articles were: motor control of ULAs practicing MI or VR was investigated. Exclusion criteria were: only healthy subjects were tested or other therapies except MI and VR were practiced. Results: Initial search provided 2,635 articles, in which 10 have been included in the analysis. ULAs and healthy subjects do not have the same neurological way of working when practicing MI or VR. The number of possible controlled movements and their accuracy are different. Some aspects, such as visual content of VR systems, may have an influence. If such therapies are interesting to be used for some ULAs, they have to be used as a supplement, but not as a substitute for classical therapies. Discussion: Supplemental search such as RCTs have to be conducted to provide strong evidences, that MI or VR are appropriate to be used for ULAs rehabilitation. MI and VR procedures have to be defined more clearly. These techniques must absolutely be tested with ULAs.
运动图像(MI)和虚拟现实(VR)技术在上肢截肢者(ULA)康复中的应用。使用先进技术假体的ULAs越来越多。我们的目的是更好地了解ULAs的运动工作,佩戴假体并使用MI和VR。方法:采用Pubmed、Cochrane、ProQuest、Web of Science、CINAHL和PSYCHINFO系统研究,分析上述治疗对肌电和脑活动、运动表现和运动相关主观数据的影响。文章的纳入标准为:ULAs练习MI或VR的运动控制的调查。排除标准为:仅健康受试者接受测试或采用MI和VR以外的其他治疗。结果:初步检索得到2635篇文章,其中10篇被纳入分析。ULAs和健康受试者在进行MI或VR时的神经学工作方式不同。可能的控制动作的数量和它们的精度是不同的。某些方面,例如VR系统的视觉内容,可能会产生影响。如果这种疗法对一些ULAs有兴趣,它们必须作为一种补充,而不是作为经典疗法的替代品。讨论:补充研究,如随机对照试验,必须进行,以提供强有力的证据,心肌梗死或VR是适合用于ULAs康复。MI和VR程序必须更明确地定义。这些技术绝对必须用ula进行测试。