Cyber exclusions: An investigation into the cyber insurance coverage gap

Frank Cremer, Barry Sheehan, Michel Fortmann, Martin Mullins, Finbarr Murphy
{"title":"Cyber exclusions: An investigation into the cyber insurance coverage gap","authors":"Frank Cremer, Barry Sheehan, Michel Fortmann, Martin Mullins, Finbarr Murphy","doi":"10.1109/Cyber-RCI55324.2022.10032678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of cyber insurance as a tool for financial resilience to mitigate the accelerating corporate losses caused by cybercrime is growing. However, there exists a lack of standardization and mutual understanding in cyber insurance policies. With less than a third of cyber insurance claims paid in 2017 in the U.S., there exists a significant gap between the cyber risks businesses need to cover and those actually covered through their cyber insurance policies. This research uses inductive qualitative content analysis to examine the existing exclusions in the terms and conditions of 40 German cyber insurers and compares the summarized results with existing cyber risk events. We posit that the lack of understanding of cyber policy wordings related to cyber risks is a significant problem for companies that could suffer significant losses. The resulting categorization of 15 exclusions and interrelationships with cyber risk events will support businesses, the insurance industry, and researchers in their efforts to understand, measure, and manage cyber risk.","PeriodicalId":378205,"journal":{"name":"2022 Cyber Research Conference - Ireland (Cyber-RCI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Cyber Research Conference - Ireland (Cyber-RCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Cyber-RCI55324.2022.10032678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of cyber insurance as a tool for financial resilience to mitigate the accelerating corporate losses caused by cybercrime is growing. However, there exists a lack of standardization and mutual understanding in cyber insurance policies. With less than a third of cyber insurance claims paid in 2017 in the U.S., there exists a significant gap between the cyber risks businesses need to cover and those actually covered through their cyber insurance policies. This research uses inductive qualitative content analysis to examine the existing exclusions in the terms and conditions of 40 German cyber insurers and compares the summarized results with existing cyber risk events. We posit that the lack of understanding of cyber policy wordings related to cyber risks is a significant problem for companies that could suffer significant losses. The resulting categorization of 15 exclusions and interrelationships with cyber risk events will support businesses, the insurance industry, and researchers in their efforts to understand, measure, and manage cyber risk.
网络排除:对网络保险覆盖面差距的调查
网络保险作为一种增强财务弹性、减轻网络犯罪造成的企业损失的工具,其重要性日益凸显。然而,网络保险政策缺乏标准化和相互理解。2017年,美国支付的网络保险索赔不到三分之一,企业需要承保的网络风险与网络保险政策实际承保的网络风险之间存在着巨大差距。本研究采用归纳定性内容分析的方法,对德国40家网络保险公司的条款和条件中现有的排除条款进行了检验,并将总结结果与现有的网络风险事件进行了比较。我们认为,对于可能遭受重大损失的公司来说,缺乏对与网络风险相关的网络政策措辞的理解是一个重大问题。由此产生的15项排除分类及其与网络风险事件的相互关系将支持企业、保险业和研究人员努力理解、衡量和管理网络风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书