Smart card security evaluation: Community solutions to intractable problems

Tony Boswell
{"title":"Smart card security evaluation: Community solutions to intractable problems","authors":"Tony Boswell","doi":"10.1016/j.istr.2009.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evaluation of smart card security faced seemingly intractable problems of consistency and repeatability in its early days. The deeply specialised technologies, large parameter spaces for attacks, and the evolving attack types and countermeasures mean that the scope for variation in evaluation practice, and hence in evaluation conclusions, is potentially huge. The situation is further complicated by the fact that countermeasures against some types of attacks depend on both hardware and software, but there is also a need to evaluate hardware without specific software present at the time of evaluation. Stakeholders in the smart card world have formed a Community that has successfully created and applied interpretation of Common Criteria (ISO 15408) to deal with this problem and to achieve international mutual recognition of evaluation results. This paper discusses examples of the smart card security problem in order to illustrate some of the difficulties, and describes some of the interpretation that has been defined for rating the difficulty of an attack via calculation of an attack potential. It also considers the nature of the Community that has enabled the interpretation to be both defined and put into practice successfully.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100669,"journal":{"name":"Information Security Technical Report","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 57-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.istr.2009.06.002","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Security Technical Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1363412709000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Evaluation of smart card security faced seemingly intractable problems of consistency and repeatability in its early days. The deeply specialised technologies, large parameter spaces for attacks, and the evolving attack types and countermeasures mean that the scope for variation in evaluation practice, and hence in evaluation conclusions, is potentially huge. The situation is further complicated by the fact that countermeasures against some types of attacks depend on both hardware and software, but there is also a need to evaluate hardware without specific software present at the time of evaluation. Stakeholders in the smart card world have formed a Community that has successfully created and applied interpretation of Common Criteria (ISO 15408) to deal with this problem and to achieve international mutual recognition of evaluation results. This paper discusses examples of the smart card security problem in order to illustrate some of the difficulties, and describes some of the interpretation that has been defined for rating the difficulty of an attack via calculation of an attack potential. It also considers the nature of the Community that has enabled the interpretation to be both defined and put into practice successfully.

智能卡安全评估:解决社区棘手问题
智能卡安全评估早期面临着一致性和可重复性等看似棘手的问题。深度专业化的技术,攻击的大参数空间,以及不断发展的攻击类型和对策意味着评估实践以及评估结论的变化范围可能是巨大的。针对某些类型攻击的对策既依赖于硬件又依赖于软件,这一事实使情况进一步复杂化,但在评估时也需要在没有特定软件的情况下评估硬件。智能卡领域的利益相关者已经形成了一个社区,成功地创建和应用了通用标准(ISO 15408)的解释来处理这个问题,并实现了评估结果的国际互认。本文讨论了智能卡安全问题的例子,以说明一些困难,并描述了通过计算攻击潜力来评估攻击难度的一些解释。它还考虑到共同体的性质,使解释既能被定义,又能成功地付诸实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信