THE ROLE OF YAROSLAV DASHKEVICH IN STUDYING THE «WHITE SPOT» OF UKRAINIAN HISTORY DURING THE «PERESTROIKA» PERIOD (1985–1991)

Anastasiia Sopelniak
{"title":"THE ROLE OF YAROSLAV DASHKEVICH IN STUDYING THE «WHITE SPOT» OF UKRAINIAN HISTORY DURING THE «PERESTROIKA» PERIOD (1985–1991)","authors":"Anastasiia Sopelniak","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-80-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author concludes about involving historians during the period of restructuring into the process of conscious reorientation of Ukrainian humanitarians. He speaking with publications in periodicals or at scientific conferences violated important aspects of the historical past of Ukraine, which were distorted or ordered in the scientific sense of Soviet time. First of all, these issues were connected with the opening of the myth of the sovereignty of the Ukrainian nation. And here, according to the historian, the return to the sources of Ukrainian historiography and critical analysis of the sources should not be the last role. However, most of the works of the scientist, in the investigated period were scientifically popular. This is due to the fact that only the first steps were taken in the national science to overcome the communist stereotypes and to study the national history. He demonstrated deep knowledge of the subject, which was based on deep study of scientific works of predecessors and source base. He constantly stressed the great importance of historical science for the formation of national consciousness, therefore demanded from scientists to look at the historical process only from the positions of their own people and prospects of its development. In the days of independence of Ukraine, some of the author’s judgments were changed by the social political circumstances, which require a deep scientific analysis of his creative heritage using comparative analysis.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-80-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author concludes about involving historians during the period of restructuring into the process of conscious reorientation of Ukrainian humanitarians. He speaking with publications in periodicals or at scientific conferences violated important aspects of the historical past of Ukraine, which were distorted or ordered in the scientific sense of Soviet time. First of all, these issues were connected with the opening of the myth of the sovereignty of the Ukrainian nation. And here, according to the historian, the return to the sources of Ukrainian historiography and critical analysis of the sources should not be the last role. However, most of the works of the scientist, in the investigated period were scientifically popular. This is due to the fact that only the first steps were taken in the national science to overcome the communist stereotypes and to study the national history. He demonstrated deep knowledge of the subject, which was based on deep study of scientific works of predecessors and source base. He constantly stressed the great importance of historical science for the formation of national consciousness, therefore demanded from scientists to look at the historical process only from the positions of their own people and prospects of its development. In the days of independence of Ukraine, some of the author’s judgments were changed by the social political circumstances, which require a deep scientific analysis of his creative heritage using comparative analysis.
雅罗斯拉夫·达什凯维奇在“改革”时期(1985-1991)乌克兰历史“白点”研究中的作用
作者总结了在乌克兰人道主义者自觉重新定位的过程中,在重组时期将历史学家纳入其中的问题。他在期刊或科学会议上发表的讲话违反了乌克兰历史的重要方面,这些方面在苏联时代的科学意义上被扭曲或有序。首先,这些问题与乌克兰民族主权神话的揭开有关。在这里,根据历史学家的说法,回归乌克兰史学的来源和对来源的批判性分析不应该是最后的角色。然而,在调查期间,大多数科学家的作品在科学上是受欢迎的。这是因为在克服共产主义刻板印象和研究民族历史的民族科学中,只采取了第一步。他在深入研究前人的科学著作和文献基础的基础上,表现出对这一学科的深刻认识。他不断强调历史科学对于民族意识形成的重要性,因此要求科学家只能站在自己人民的立场上看待历史进程及其发展前景。在乌克兰独立的日子里,作者的一些判断被社会政治环境所改变,这需要用比较分析的方法对他的创作遗产进行深入的科学分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信