A Replication of Comparative Study of Moving Windows on Linear Regression and Estimation by Analogy

S. Amasaki, C. Lokan
{"title":"A Replication of Comparative Study of Moving Windows on Linear Regression and Estimation by Analogy","authors":"S. Amasaki, C. Lokan","doi":"10.1145/2810146.2810153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Recent studies have shown that estimation accuracy can be affected by only using a window of recent projects as training data for building an effort estimation model. The effect and its extent can be affected by effort estimation methods (e.g. linear regression (LR) or estimation by analogy (EbA)), windowing policies (fixed-size or fixed-duration), and between organizations. However, different effects between organizations have only been explored with LR as the estimation method, and different effects between estimation methods and windowing policies have mainly been explored with data from only one organization. Objective: To further investigate the effect on estimation accuracy of using windows, with different windowing policies, when using EbA as the estimation method. Also, to compare the effect of LR with EbA as an estimation method, when using windows. Method: Using a data set studied with LR in previous research, we examine the effects of using windows on the accuracy of effort estimates, using EbA with both fixed-size and fixed-duration windowing policies. Results: With this data set, fixed-size windows, no matter their size, do not improve the accuracy of estimates obtained using EbA. This reinforces previous research with this data set, which used LR as the estimation approach. However, fixed-duration windows can improve the accuracy of estimates obtained with EbA. This contradicts previous research with this data set, which used LR as the estimation approach. Variations in the settings for EbA can change the sizes at which windows are helpful. Conclusions: This study reinforces that the effect of using windows can be affected by the effort estimation approach, and by the windowing policy. Contrary to previous research, fixed-duration windows are found to be more helpful than fixed-size windows, and significant improvements are found with EbA that were not found with LR. Further research is needed to understand these differences.","PeriodicalId":189774,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2810146.2810153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Context: Recent studies have shown that estimation accuracy can be affected by only using a window of recent projects as training data for building an effort estimation model. The effect and its extent can be affected by effort estimation methods (e.g. linear regression (LR) or estimation by analogy (EbA)), windowing policies (fixed-size or fixed-duration), and between organizations. However, different effects between organizations have only been explored with LR as the estimation method, and different effects between estimation methods and windowing policies have mainly been explored with data from only one organization. Objective: To further investigate the effect on estimation accuracy of using windows, with different windowing policies, when using EbA as the estimation method. Also, to compare the effect of LR with EbA as an estimation method, when using windows. Method: Using a data set studied with LR in previous research, we examine the effects of using windows on the accuracy of effort estimates, using EbA with both fixed-size and fixed-duration windowing policies. Results: With this data set, fixed-size windows, no matter their size, do not improve the accuracy of estimates obtained using EbA. This reinforces previous research with this data set, which used LR as the estimation approach. However, fixed-duration windows can improve the accuracy of estimates obtained with EbA. This contradicts previous research with this data set, which used LR as the estimation approach. Variations in the settings for EbA can change the sizes at which windows are helpful. Conclusions: This study reinforces that the effect of using windows can be affected by the effort estimation approach, and by the windowing policy. Contrary to previous research, fixed-duration windows are found to be more helpful than fixed-size windows, and significant improvements are found with EbA that were not found with LR. Further research is needed to understand these differences.
线性回归与类比估计中移动窗口的比较研究
上下文:最近的研究表明,仅使用最近项目的一个窗口作为构建工作量估计模型的训练数据,就可以影响估计的准确性。效果及其程度可以受到工作估计方法(例如线性回归(LR)或类比估计(EbA))、窗口策略(固定规模或固定持续时间)以及组织之间的影响。然而,仅以LR作为估计方法探讨了组织之间的不同影响,并且仅以一个组织的数据主要探讨了估计方法和窗口政策之间的不同影响。目的:进一步探讨以EbA为估计方法时,不同窗口策略下使用窗口对估计精度的影响。同时,在使用窗口的情况下,比较LR和EbA作为估计方法的效果。方法:使用先前研究中使用LR研究的数据集,我们使用固定大小和固定持续时间窗口策略的EbA,检查使用窗口对工作量估计准确性的影响。结果:对于该数据集,固定大小的窗口,无论其大小,都不会提高使用EbA获得的估计的准确性。这加强了先前使用LR作为估计方法的数据集的研究。然而,固定时间窗口可以提高用EbA获得的估计的准确性。这与之前使用LR作为估计方法的数据集研究相矛盾。EbA设置的变化可以改变有用窗口的大小。结论:本研究强调,使用窗口的效果可以受到工作量估计方法和窗口策略的影响。与之前的研究相反,固定时间窗口被发现比固定大小窗口更有帮助,并且EbA发现了显著的改善,而LR没有发现。需要进一步的研究来理解这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信