Clash of the Titans: The Impact of Weiss on the Future of Judicial Conflicts in the EU

L. Orešković
{"title":"Clash of the Titans: The Impact of Weiss on the Future of Judicial Conflicts in the EU","authors":"L. Orešković","doi":"10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the recent Weiss/PSPP decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the German Federal Constitutional Court, attempting to contextualise these decisions within previous conflicts between these two courts. The FCC’s case law is studied through the perspective of three different types of reviews it developed: fundamental rights review, ultra vires review and constitutional identity review. Then, a detailed analysis of the Weiss and PSPP cases is given in order to understand the repercussions of the first case in which the FCC officially exercised its proclaimed competences and declared the CJEU and ECB’s decisions as ultra vires, undermining fundamental principles of the EU legal order. This act could potentially lead to significant changes in current mechanisms of resolving disputes between the highest courts of the EU and national legal orders. Finally, the future of judicial conflicts is discussed through the analysis of the Weiler/Sarmiento model and the system (or lack of system) of resolving the conflicts currently in place. The paper concludes by highlighting that the Weiss/PSPP decisions could very well be those that finally stimulate a long-needed solution. \nKeywords: judicial conflicts, Bundesverfassungsgericht, judicial review, economic cooperation, Weiss, PSPP. \n  \n \nThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. \n  \nSuggested citation: L Oreskovic, ‘Clash of the Titans: The Impact of Weiss on the Future of Judicial Conflicts in the EU’ (2020) 16 CYELP 245.","PeriodicalId":137938,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper deals with the recent Weiss/PSPP decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the German Federal Constitutional Court, attempting to contextualise these decisions within previous conflicts between these two courts. The FCC’s case law is studied through the perspective of three different types of reviews it developed: fundamental rights review, ultra vires review and constitutional identity review. Then, a detailed analysis of the Weiss and PSPP cases is given in order to understand the repercussions of the first case in which the FCC officially exercised its proclaimed competences and declared the CJEU and ECB’s decisions as ultra vires, undermining fundamental principles of the EU legal order. This act could potentially lead to significant changes in current mechanisms of resolving disputes between the highest courts of the EU and national legal orders. Finally, the future of judicial conflicts is discussed through the analysis of the Weiler/Sarmiento model and the system (or lack of system) of resolving the conflicts currently in place. The paper concludes by highlighting that the Weiss/PSPP decisions could very well be those that finally stimulate a long-needed solution. Keywords: judicial conflicts, Bundesverfassungsgericht, judicial review, economic cooperation, Weiss, PSPP.   This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License.   Suggested citation: L Oreskovic, ‘Clash of the Titans: The Impact of Weiss on the Future of Judicial Conflicts in the EU’ (2020) 16 CYELP 245.
《泰坦之战:维斯对欧盟司法冲突未来的影响
本文涉及欧盟法院和德国联邦宪法法院最近的Weiss/PSPP决定,试图将这些决定置于这两个法院之前的冲突中。本文从联邦通信委员会判例法发展的三种不同类型的审查:基本权利审查、越权审查和宪法身份审查的角度来研究联邦通信委员会的判例法。然后,对Weiss和PSPP案例进行了详细的分析,以理解第一个案例的影响,在第一个案例中,FCC正式行使其宣称的权限,并宣布欧洲法院和欧洲央行的决定是越权的,破坏了欧盟法律秩序的基本原则。该法案可能会导致欧盟最高法院与国家法律秩序之间解决争端的现行机制发生重大变化。最后,通过对维勒/萨米恩托模型的分析,以及目前解决司法冲突的制度(或缺乏制度),探讨了司法冲突的未来。论文最后强调,Weiss/PSPP的决定很可能最终激发出一个长期需要的解决方案。关键词:司法冲突,联邦法院,司法审查,经济合作,Weiss, PSPP本作品在知识共享署名-非商业-无衍生品4.0国际许可下获得许可。建议引用:L Oreskovic,“泰坦的冲突:Weiss对欧盟司法冲突未来的影响”(2020)16 CYELP 245。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信