Specifics of Algorithmization in Data Culture

Tadeusz Miczka
{"title":"Specifics of Algorithmization in Data Culture","authors":"Tadeusz Miczka","doi":"10.26417/ejef.v3i3.p13-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Information societies effectively transform existing cultures. New cultures are variously defined, but because of the fact that they are dominated by information, the term “data cultures” seems to be the most relevant name for them. Although, it is possible to create a single global data culture in the future and such predictions prevail in academic and non-academic reflections on this subject, so far in addition to global trends there occur local data cultures, what also dynamizes and enriches both individual and collective identities. As Kazimierz Krzysztofek aptly notes, in this situation: \"The greatest contradiction of the civilization of the 21st century is drawn. On the one hand, a continuous imperative: be creative and innovative, on the other hand, an increasing pressure on prediction of people’s behaviour, because unpredictability causes chaos, which cannot be managed\". In other words, one of the most important social issues today is to create some order in data culture / cultures (often pictured by columnists and researchers as a \"magnetic storm\"), to reduce its / their infinite complexity, i.e. simply the algorithmization process. With regard to culture, it is not possible to use unequivocally a mathematical algorithm that is the most precise, or a genetic or hormonal algorithm that functions in nature, because accustoming cultural chaos is always strongly ideologized. The algorithm should be treated as a metaphor used to explain cultural phenomena, especially their developmental tendencies. For the researcher of contemporary societies, it is very important to answer the question: what proportions of structure and network are the most beneficial for the survival of data culture / cultures? This answer also directs reflection on the quality of life of individuals and societies, limiting or promoting individualism and collective intelligence in the era of hyper-digitization. These considerations are limited to the initial characterization and evaluation of the information algorithmization of man. The author of the study refers to the concepts of researchers from different countries, highlighting the specificity of today's algorithmization, among others the model of ambient perception, which facilitates participation in the networked information environment, scope and reach of the big data phenomenon, forms of data visualization, personalization of content, Isotype visual language, network custody, data journalism and others. In conclusion, it is pointed out that the information algorithmization of man is constantly growing, which proves that data management strategies weaken the phenomenon of information overload through the logic of numerical civilization, which limits diversity, seeking to count, record and globalize everything.","PeriodicalId":202400,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering","volume":"288 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/ejef.v3i3.p13-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Information societies effectively transform existing cultures. New cultures are variously defined, but because of the fact that they are dominated by information, the term “data cultures” seems to be the most relevant name for them. Although, it is possible to create a single global data culture in the future and such predictions prevail in academic and non-academic reflections on this subject, so far in addition to global trends there occur local data cultures, what also dynamizes and enriches both individual and collective identities. As Kazimierz Krzysztofek aptly notes, in this situation: "The greatest contradiction of the civilization of the 21st century is drawn. On the one hand, a continuous imperative: be creative and innovative, on the other hand, an increasing pressure on prediction of people’s behaviour, because unpredictability causes chaos, which cannot be managed". In other words, one of the most important social issues today is to create some order in data culture / cultures (often pictured by columnists and researchers as a "magnetic storm"), to reduce its / their infinite complexity, i.e. simply the algorithmization process. With regard to culture, it is not possible to use unequivocally a mathematical algorithm that is the most precise, or a genetic or hormonal algorithm that functions in nature, because accustoming cultural chaos is always strongly ideologized. The algorithm should be treated as a metaphor used to explain cultural phenomena, especially their developmental tendencies. For the researcher of contemporary societies, it is very important to answer the question: what proportions of structure and network are the most beneficial for the survival of data culture / cultures? This answer also directs reflection on the quality of life of individuals and societies, limiting or promoting individualism and collective intelligence in the era of hyper-digitization. These considerations are limited to the initial characterization and evaluation of the information algorithmization of man. The author of the study refers to the concepts of researchers from different countries, highlighting the specificity of today's algorithmization, among others the model of ambient perception, which facilitates participation in the networked information environment, scope and reach of the big data phenomenon, forms of data visualization, personalization of content, Isotype visual language, network custody, data journalism and others. In conclusion, it is pointed out that the information algorithmization of man is constantly growing, which proves that data management strategies weaken the phenomenon of information overload through the logic of numerical civilization, which limits diversity, seeking to count, record and globalize everything.
数据文化中算法化的细节
信息社会有效地改变了现有的文化。新的文化有不同的定义,但由于它们是由信息主导的,术语“数据文化”似乎是与它们最相关的名称。虽然,在未来有可能创造一个单一的全球数据文化,这种预测在这个主题的学术和非学术反思中普遍存在,但到目前为止,除了全球趋势之外,还存在本地数据文化,这也激活和丰富了个人和集体的身份。在这种情况下,卡齐米兹·克日什托费克恰如其分地指出:“21世纪文明的最大矛盾已经形成。一方面是持续的要求:要有创造力和创新性,另一方面,对人们行为的预测压力越来越大,因为不可预测性会导致混乱,而这种混乱是无法控制的”。换句话说,当今最重要的社会问题之一是在数据文化/文化中创造一些秩序(经常被专栏作家和研究人员描绘为“磁暴”),以减少其无限的复杂性,即简单的算法过程。就文化而言,不可能明确地使用最精确的数学算法,也不可能使用在自然界中起作用的遗传或激素算法,因为习惯文化混乱总是被强烈地意识形态化。该算法应被视为一种隐喻,用来解释文化现象,特别是文化现象的发展趋势。对于当代社会的研究者来说,回答这样一个问题是非常重要的:什么样的结构和网络比例对数据文化/文化的生存最有利?这个答案也引导了对个人和社会生活质量的反思,在超数字化时代限制或促进个人主义和集体智慧。这些考虑仅限于对人类信息算法的初步表征和评估。该研究的作者参考了不同国家研究者的概念,突出了当今算法化的特殊性,其中包括促进参与网络信息环境的环境感知模型、大数据现象的范围和范围、数据可视化的形式、内容的个性化、Isotype视觉语言、网络保管、数据新闻等。最后指出,人类的信息算法化在不断增长,这证明了数据管理策略通过数字文明的逻辑削弱了信息过载的现象,这种逻辑限制了多样性,寻求计数、记录和全球化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信