Interpretation in modern legal literature on the functioning of private and public law

N. Teremtsova
{"title":"Interpretation in modern legal literature on the functioning of private and public law","authors":"N. Teremtsova","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is concerned with problem of interpretation the public and private law. At the beginning of the article the author describes the imperfection of approaches to differentiation.The article examines the topical issue of general theory of law, which contains a delicate phenomenon that has existed for a long time, but during all this time has not developed a common understanding of its basic parameters, and therefore remain controversial theoretical foundations for construction and operation. Its existence raises a number of very important questions about properties for the legal community. At the moment it is not possible to assert the presence of the same understanding of the essence of separation of the right to private and public. Different scientific schools actually offer his vision within the Ukrainian legal system and traditional doctrine. It would be wise to mention here at the present stage of development of legal matter, it is necessary to make some adjustments to the traditional theory of law, as well as some provisions of the law regarding the division of law into private and public. In brief each new field studied by scientists is a legal phenomenon, but when applying general theoretical conclusions to it, it is necessary to take into account the specifics of the object under study in terms of the general theory of law. To conclude a pattern that allows to establish two objectively independent branches of law, linking them to the manifestations of public and private foundations, and to represent the spread of rights to private and public, as it is not just a classification, but conceptual, concerning the most fundamental rights of each place and role in human life, its defined values, continues in the theory of law today.\n\nKeywords: public law, private law, legal system, legal science, branches of law.\n\nReferences","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is concerned with problem of interpretation the public and private law. At the beginning of the article the author describes the imperfection of approaches to differentiation.The article examines the topical issue of general theory of law, which contains a delicate phenomenon that has existed for a long time, but during all this time has not developed a common understanding of its basic parameters, and therefore remain controversial theoretical foundations for construction and operation. Its existence raises a number of very important questions about properties for the legal community. At the moment it is not possible to assert the presence of the same understanding of the essence of separation of the right to private and public. Different scientific schools actually offer his vision within the Ukrainian legal system and traditional doctrine. It would be wise to mention here at the present stage of development of legal matter, it is necessary to make some adjustments to the traditional theory of law, as well as some provisions of the law regarding the division of law into private and public. In brief each new field studied by scientists is a legal phenomenon, but when applying general theoretical conclusions to it, it is necessary to take into account the specifics of the object under study in terms of the general theory of law. To conclude a pattern that allows to establish two objectively independent branches of law, linking them to the manifestations of public and private foundations, and to represent the spread of rights to private and public, as it is not just a classification, but conceptual, concerning the most fundamental rights of each place and role in human life, its defined values, continues in the theory of law today. Keywords: public law, private law, legal system, legal science, branches of law. References
现代法律文献中对私法和公法功能的解释
本文探讨了公法与私法的解释问题。在文章开头,作者描述了辨析方法的不完善之处。本文考察的是一般法学的专题问题,它包含了一个长期存在的微妙现象,但一直没有形成对其基本参数的共同认识,因此仍然是有争议的理论基础的建设和操作。它的存在为法律界提出了一些关于财产的非常重要的问题。目前,不可能主张对公私权利分离的本质有同样的理解。不同的科学学派实际上在乌克兰法律体系和传统学说中提供了他的观点。在法律事务发展的现阶段,有必要对传统的法律理论以及法律中关于私法与公法之分的一些规定进行一些调整。简而言之,科学家所研究的每一个新领域都是一种法律现象,但在将一般理论结论应用于该领域时,必须从一般法学的角度考虑所研究对象的具体情况。总结一种模式,允许建立两个客观独立的法律分支,将它们与公共和私人基金会的表现形式联系起来,并代表私人和公共权利的传播,因为它不仅是一种分类,而且是概念性的,涉及人类生活中每个地方和角色的最基本权利,其定义的价值,在今天的法律理论中继续存在。关键词:公法、私法、法律体系、法学、法律分支。参考文献
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信