Ethical Standards for Information Systems Professionals - 30 years after “A Case for a Unified Code”

Diana Ribeiro, J. Varajão
{"title":"Ethical Standards for Information Systems Professionals - 30 years after “A Case for a Unified Code”","authors":"Diana Ribeiro, J. Varajão","doi":"10.17705/1atrr.00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological advances increasingly mark our society, but also bring with them unique ethical challenges. In 1992, a paper entitled “Ethical Standards for Information Systems Professionals: A Case for a Unified Code” by Effy Oz was published in MISQ. Since then, much has happened in the area of technologies and information systems. New business contexts, methodological approaches, technologies, applications, and many other changes have occurred, requiring a renewed attention to ethical concerns and warranting a revisiting of the theme 30 years later. This article follows the same structure and methodological approach as used in Effy Oz’s work, focusing on the current versions of the ethical codes of leading organizations. The objectives are as follows: (1) to reflect on the changes made to the codes over 30 years, (2) to examine whether the recommendations proposed in Oz’s original work are reflected in the current versions of the codes, and (3) to conclude if the need for a unified code of ethics still prevails. The results indicate that, depending on the organization, the impact of the “passage of time” on the codes was different; several recommendations — which are still valid — are not fully reflected in the documents, thus continuing the need for a unified code of ethics (albeit with some different characteristics from those identified three decades ago).","PeriodicalId":193731,"journal":{"name":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological advances increasingly mark our society, but also bring with them unique ethical challenges. In 1992, a paper entitled “Ethical Standards for Information Systems Professionals: A Case for a Unified Code” by Effy Oz was published in MISQ. Since then, much has happened in the area of technologies and information systems. New business contexts, methodological approaches, technologies, applications, and many other changes have occurred, requiring a renewed attention to ethical concerns and warranting a revisiting of the theme 30 years later. This article follows the same structure and methodological approach as used in Effy Oz’s work, focusing on the current versions of the ethical codes of leading organizations. The objectives are as follows: (1) to reflect on the changes made to the codes over 30 years, (2) to examine whether the recommendations proposed in Oz’s original work are reflected in the current versions of the codes, and (3) to conclude if the need for a unified code of ethics still prevails. The results indicate that, depending on the organization, the impact of the “passage of time” on the codes was different; several recommendations — which are still valid — are not fully reflected in the documents, thus continuing the need for a unified code of ethics (albeit with some different characteristics from those identified three decades ago).
资讯系统专业人员的道德标准-“统一守则案例”30周年
技术进步日益成为我们社会的标志,但也带来了独特的道德挑战。1992年,Effy Oz在MISQ上发表了一篇题为“信息系统专业人员的道德标准:统一代码的案例”的论文。从那时起,技术和信息系统领域发生了许多变化。新的业务环境、方法方法、技术、应用和许多其他变化已经发生,需要重新关注伦理问题,并要求在30年后重新审视这一主题。本文遵循Effy Oz著作中使用的相同结构和方法方法,重点关注领导组织的道德规范的当前版本。目的如下:(1)反思30年来准则的变化,(2)检查奥兹最初工作中提出的建议是否反映在当前版本的准则中,以及(3)得出结论,是否仍然需要统一的道德准则。结果表明:“时间流逝”对规范的影响随组织的不同而不同;几项仍然有效的建议没有充分反映在文件中,因此仍然需要统一的道德守则(尽管与三十年前确定的道德守则有一些不同的特点)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信