Exhibit A:

Michael J. Whinihan, Dean A. Drake, David Aldorfer
{"title":"Exhibit A:","authors":"Michael J. Whinihan, Dean A. Drake, David Aldorfer","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvrdf125.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retail Price Equivalent (RPE) is a methodology used by accountants and financial managers at vehicle manufacturers to determine the markup required from direct manufacturing costs the costs of materials and labor to the retail price at which a vehicle or component must sell in order to earn at least a competitive rate of return on their investments in technology. The appropriate markup consists of the indirect or overhead costs associated with R&D, pensions and health care, warranties, advertising, maintaining a dealer network, and profits. The National Research Council (NRC) finds a consensus among internal financial managers and outside analysts for an average RPE of around or slightly above 2.0, or twice the level of direct manufacturing costs. Historically, the government has used the RPE methodology to mark up direct manufacturing costs to retail. For the MY 2012-2016 greenhouse gas (GHG) and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, the government used a lower RPE of 1.5 in conjunction with the newly developed concept of Indirect Cost Multipliers (ICMs). Most recently, for MYs 2017-2025, it scrapped the RPE approach in favor of ICMs which results in an average markup of 1.25. This paper confirms the NRC’s consensus estimate of a 2.0 RPE markup and implies that the agencies have underestimated the increased consumer prices resulting from their proposal by a factor of 1.6. The ICM approach substantially underestimates the costs of the proposed standards and the significant losses of light vehicle sales and manufacturer, supplier, and dealer jobs. When an appropriate 2.0 RPE factor is applied to the proposal’s estimated costs, the per vehicle price increase increases from an estimated $2,937 to $4,803.","PeriodicalId":404466,"journal":{"name":"Brahms's A German Requiem","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brahms's A German Requiem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvrdf125.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Retail Price Equivalent (RPE) is a methodology used by accountants and financial managers at vehicle manufacturers to determine the markup required from direct manufacturing costs the costs of materials and labor to the retail price at which a vehicle or component must sell in order to earn at least a competitive rate of return on their investments in technology. The appropriate markup consists of the indirect or overhead costs associated with R&D, pensions and health care, warranties, advertising, maintaining a dealer network, and profits. The National Research Council (NRC) finds a consensus among internal financial managers and outside analysts for an average RPE of around or slightly above 2.0, or twice the level of direct manufacturing costs. Historically, the government has used the RPE methodology to mark up direct manufacturing costs to retail. For the MY 2012-2016 greenhouse gas (GHG) and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, the government used a lower RPE of 1.5 in conjunction with the newly developed concept of Indirect Cost Multipliers (ICMs). Most recently, for MYs 2017-2025, it scrapped the RPE approach in favor of ICMs which results in an average markup of 1.25. This paper confirms the NRC’s consensus estimate of a 2.0 RPE markup and implies that the agencies have underestimated the increased consumer prices resulting from their proposal by a factor of 1.6. The ICM approach substantially underestimates the costs of the proposed standards and the significant losses of light vehicle sales and manufacturer, supplier, and dealer jobs. When an appropriate 2.0 RPE factor is applied to the proposal’s estimated costs, the per vehicle price increase increases from an estimated $2,937 to $4,803.
场景一:
零售价格当量(RPE)是汽车制造商的会计师和财务经理使用的一种方法,用于确定从直接制造成本(材料和劳动力成本)到汽车或零部件必须销售的零售价格所需的加价,以便至少获得具有竞争力的技术投资回报率。适当的加价包括与研发、养老金和医疗保健、保修、广告、维护经销商网络和利润相关的间接或间接成本。美国国家研究委员会(NRC)发现,内部财务经理和外部分析师一致认为,平均RPE约为或略高于2.0,或直接制造成本水平的两倍。从历史上看,政府一直使用RPE方法来提高零售的直接制造成本。对于2012-2016年的温室气体(GHG)和企业平均燃料经济性(CAFE)标准,政府使用了较低的RPE 1.5,并结合了新开发的间接成本乘数(ICMs)概念。最近,在2017-2025年,该公司取消了RPE方法,转而采用ICMs,平均涨幅为1.25。这篇论文证实了NRC对2.0 RPE加价的共识估计,并暗示这些机构低估了由于他们的提议而导致的消费者价格上涨的1.6倍。ICM方法大大低估了拟议标准的成本,以及轻型汽车销售和制造商、供应商和经销商工作岗位的重大损失。如果对提议的估计费用采用适当的2.0边际收益系数,则每辆车的价格增加从估计的$2 937增加到$4 803。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信