Enhanced Latent Semantic Analysis by considering mistyped words in automated essay scoring

Martin Sendra, Rudy Sutrisno, Josep Harianata, Derwin Suhartono, Almodad Biduk Asmani
{"title":"Enhanced Latent Semantic Analysis by considering mistyped words in automated essay scoring","authors":"Martin Sendra, Rudy Sutrisno, Josep Harianata, Derwin Suhartono, Almodad Biduk Asmani","doi":"10.1109/IAC.2016.7905734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present an approach to consider the mistyped words which frequently occur in an essay. Not all the mistyped words are totally wrong. If they are caused by human errors, we should look further to handle it. Thus, enhanced version of Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) is proposed. LSA is enhanced by calculating the value of mistyped words before constructing the term document matrix. Essays which are scored consists of 119 English essays of student's writing assignment while several essays as gold standard are made by experts. All of the essays have been scored manually by the human grader. Enhanced LSA gives the closeness level of 0.242 to human judgment, while LSA indicates the closeness level of 0.244 to human judgment. Unfortunately, Enhanced LSA cannot outperform GLSA which is one of current methods. The experiment result indicates that Enhanced LSA by considering mistyped words has a better closeness value to human judgment compared with LSA","PeriodicalId":404904,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2016.7905734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, we present an approach to consider the mistyped words which frequently occur in an essay. Not all the mistyped words are totally wrong. If they are caused by human errors, we should look further to handle it. Thus, enhanced version of Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) is proposed. LSA is enhanced by calculating the value of mistyped words before constructing the term document matrix. Essays which are scored consists of 119 English essays of student's writing assignment while several essays as gold standard are made by experts. All of the essays have been scored manually by the human grader. Enhanced LSA gives the closeness level of 0.242 to human judgment, while LSA indicates the closeness level of 0.244 to human judgment. Unfortunately, Enhanced LSA cannot outperform GLSA which is one of current methods. The experiment result indicates that Enhanced LSA by considering mistyped words has a better closeness value to human judgment compared with LSA
在自动作文评分中考虑错字的增强潜在语义分析
在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来考虑在一篇文章中经常出现的错别字。并不是所有的错别字都是完全错误的。如果它们是由人为错误引起的,我们应该进一步研究如何处理它。因此,我们提出了增强版本的潜在语义分析(LSA)。通过在构建词文档矩阵之前计算错误输入的词的值来增强LSA。评分的论文由学生写作作业的119篇英文论文组成,其中有几篇作为金标准的论文由专家撰写。所有的文章都是由人类评分员手动评分的。增强型LSA与人类判断的接近度为0.242,而LSA与人类判断的接近度为0.244。可惜的是,增强型LSA的性能并不能超过GLSA,这是目前常用的一种方法。实验结果表明,与LSA相比,考虑错字的增强LSA对人的判断有更好的接近值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信