How the Monitoring Events of Individual Students Are Associated With Phases of Regulation: A Network Analysis Approach

Jonna Malmberg, Mohammed Saqr, H. Järvenoja, Sanna Järvelä
{"title":"How the Monitoring Events of Individual Students Are Associated With Phases of Regulation: A Network Analysis Approach","authors":"Jonna Malmberg, Mohammed Saqr, H. Järvenoja, Sanna Järvelä","doi":"10.18608/jla.2022.7429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study uses a within-person temporal and sequential analysis to understand individual learning processes as part of collaborative learning. Contemporary perspectives of self-regulated learning acknowledge monitoring as a crucial mechanism for each phase of the regulated learning cycle, but little is known about the function of the monitoring of these phases by individual students in groups and the role of motivation in this process. This study addresses this gap by investigating how monitoring coexists temporally and progresses sequentially during collaborative learning. Twelve high school students participated in an advanced physics course and collaborated in groups of three for twenty 90-minute learning sessions. Each student’s monitoring events were first identified from the videotaped sessions and then associated with the regulation phase. In addition, the ways in which students acknowledged each monitoring event were coded. The results showed that cyclical phases of regulation do not coexist. However, when we examined temporal and sequential aspects of monitoring, the results showed that the monitoring of motivation predicts the monitoring of task definition, leading to task enactment. The results suggest that motivation is embedded in regulation phases. The current study sheds light on idiographic methods that have implications for individual learning analytics.","PeriodicalId":145357,"journal":{"name":"J. Learn. Anal.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Learn. Anal.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The current study uses a within-person temporal and sequential analysis to understand individual learning processes as part of collaborative learning. Contemporary perspectives of self-regulated learning acknowledge monitoring as a crucial mechanism for each phase of the regulated learning cycle, but little is known about the function of the monitoring of these phases by individual students in groups and the role of motivation in this process. This study addresses this gap by investigating how monitoring coexists temporally and progresses sequentially during collaborative learning. Twelve high school students participated in an advanced physics course and collaborated in groups of three for twenty 90-minute learning sessions. Each student’s monitoring events were first identified from the videotaped sessions and then associated with the regulation phase. In addition, the ways in which students acknowledged each monitoring event were coded. The results showed that cyclical phases of regulation do not coexist. However, when we examined temporal and sequential aspects of monitoring, the results showed that the monitoring of motivation predicts the monitoring of task definition, leading to task enactment. The results suggest that motivation is embedded in regulation phases. The current study sheds light on idiographic methods that have implications for individual learning analytics.
个别学生的监控事件如何与监管阶段相关联:网络分析方法
目前的研究使用个人时间和顺序分析来理解个人学习过程作为协作学习的一部分。当代自我调节学习的观点承认,监测是受调节学习周期的每个阶段的关键机制,但对群体中学生个体对这些阶段的监测功能以及动机在这一过程中的作用知之甚少。本研究通过调查监控在协作学习过程中是如何暂时共存和顺序发展的来解决这一差距。12名高中生参加了一门高级物理课程,并以三人一组的形式进行了20次90分钟的学习。每个学生的监控事件首先从录像中确定,然后与监管阶段相关联。此外,学生确认每个监控事件的方式也被编码。结果表明,周期性调控阶段并不共存。然而,当我们考察监测的时间和顺序方面时,结果表明,动机监测预示着任务定义的监测,从而导致任务制定。结果表明,动机嵌入在监管阶段。目前的研究揭示了具体的方法,对个人学习分析的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信