Democracy and Totalitarianism in Contemporary Understanding

A. Novoseltsev, Новосельцев Алексей Юрьевич
{"title":"Democracy and Totalitarianism in Contemporary Understanding","authors":"A. Novoseltsev, Новосельцев Алексей Юрьевич","doi":"10.17816/rjls18500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The examination of political reactions content in historical terms has shown that their substance does not remain unchanged. Originally democracy means perverted and unnatural political order, the power of poor, that occurs only for a very short time during the political crises. Democracy began to name government by the people or majority only from the first bourgeois revolutions.The author believes that the idea of government by the people is deeply populist and it is against the laws of nature and society. The generally accepted classification of political reactions does not take into account the useful properties of hierarchy for the society and completely identify the socially useful and legally enshrined in corporate affairs principle of one-man management with totalitarian regime.Currently not a single “color revolution” is not without a number of slogans and populist perceptions about human being and society presented in the end of the XVIII century. The spread of “democracy” does not involve the assistance in economic development and in the establishment of the high social standards typical for west countries, but on the contrary preserve poverty and backwardness of world periphery.The author comes to a conclusion that it is necessary to develop the more modern and adequate perceptions about politic reactions taking into account the explanations of natural sciences. In the authors view the democracy constitute “soft” hierarchy that admit the majority of the people to the acceptable social status in conditions of missing the firm competitive relations in the society. Solidarity among people, consensus of the interests, moral and political unity as a result of approximately equal social status, social stability and mobility, the lack of deep social division are the main characteristics of the democracy. Totalitarianism can be defined as a violence from the side of society or collective towards person who does not want follow antihuman consumer values.","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The examination of political reactions content in historical terms has shown that their substance does not remain unchanged. Originally democracy means perverted and unnatural political order, the power of poor, that occurs only for a very short time during the political crises. Democracy began to name government by the people or majority only from the first bourgeois revolutions.The author believes that the idea of government by the people is deeply populist and it is against the laws of nature and society. The generally accepted classification of political reactions does not take into account the useful properties of hierarchy for the society and completely identify the socially useful and legally enshrined in corporate affairs principle of one-man management with totalitarian regime.Currently not a single “color revolution” is not without a number of slogans and populist perceptions about human being and society presented in the end of the XVIII century. The spread of “democracy” does not involve the assistance in economic development and in the establishment of the high social standards typical for west countries, but on the contrary preserve poverty and backwardness of world periphery.The author comes to a conclusion that it is necessary to develop the more modern and adequate perceptions about politic reactions taking into account the explanations of natural sciences. In the authors view the democracy constitute “soft” hierarchy that admit the majority of the people to the acceptable social status in conditions of missing the firm competitive relations in the society. Solidarity among people, consensus of the interests, moral and political unity as a result of approximately equal social status, social stability and mobility, the lack of deep social division are the main characteristics of the democracy. Totalitarianism can be defined as a violence from the side of society or collective towards person who does not want follow antihuman consumer values.
当代理解中的民主与极权主义
从历史角度考察政治反应的内容表明,它们的实质并不是一成不变的。民主原本是指变态的、不自然的政治秩序,穷人的权力,在政治危机中只会出现很短的时间。民主只是在第一次资产阶级革命时才开始被称为人民或多数人的政府。作者认为,民治思想具有深刻的民粹主义色彩,违背了自然规律和社会规律。人们普遍接受的政治反应分类没有考虑到等级制度对社会的有益性质,完全把对社会有益和法律上载入公司事务的一人管理原则与极权主义政权等同起来。目前,每一场“颜色革命”都少不了18世纪末出现的一些口号和对人类和社会的民粹主义看法。“民主”的传播并不包括帮助发展经济和建立西方国家特有的高社会标准,相反,它保留了世界边缘地区的贫困和落后。作者认为,考虑到自然科学的解释,有必要发展对政治反应的更现代和充分的认识。在作者看来,民主构成了一种“软”等级制度,它在缺少社会中坚定的竞争关系的情况下,承认大多数人处于可接受的社会地位。人民之间的团结、利益的一致、道德和政治上的统一由于社会地位的近似平等、社会的稳定和流动性、缺乏深刻的社会分裂是民主的主要特征。极权主义可以被定义为社会或集体对不愿遵循反人类消费价值观的人施加的暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信