The Evaluation of Implementation of Mudaraba Financing in Participation Banks in terms of Moral Hazard: The Case of Turkey

Muhlis Selman Saglam, Taha Eğri
{"title":"The Evaluation of Implementation of Mudaraba Financing in Participation Banks in terms of Moral Hazard: The Case of Turkey","authors":"Muhlis Selman Saglam, Taha Eğri","doi":"10.25272/ijisef.689009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labor capital partnership is a financing model that contributes to social development. Although the mudaraba financing is a good alternative for interest-free financial system, the implementation ratio in participation banks is very low in the form of participation banks providing capital and the customer provides labor. This situation has not been handled as much as necessary in the literature, and the suggestions presented have been superficial. This research aims to raise awareness by evaluating possible causes from the perspective of participation bank. The research, which argues that mudaraba financing poses moral risk for participation banks, evaluated this claim by conducting semi-structured interviews with experts in the field within the framework of the relationship between moral risk and the legal infrastructure, informal transactions, commercial maturity level, economic conjuncture and audit concepts. As a result of the interviews and subsequent assessment, it has been concluded that participation banks do not have the infrastructure to implement the mudaraba financing and a new institution that operates differently from the participation banks must be established in order to implement this model in a sustainable manner. In the last section, policy recommendations have been presented in order to increase the applicability of mudaraba financing.","PeriodicalId":136568,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25272/ijisef.689009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Labor capital partnership is a financing model that contributes to social development. Although the mudaraba financing is a good alternative for interest-free financial system, the implementation ratio in participation banks is very low in the form of participation banks providing capital and the customer provides labor. This situation has not been handled as much as necessary in the literature, and the suggestions presented have been superficial. This research aims to raise awareness by evaluating possible causes from the perspective of participation bank. The research, which argues that mudaraba financing poses moral risk for participation banks, evaluated this claim by conducting semi-structured interviews with experts in the field within the framework of the relationship between moral risk and the legal infrastructure, informal transactions, commercial maturity level, economic conjuncture and audit concepts. As a result of the interviews and subsequent assessment, it has been concluded that participation banks do not have the infrastructure to implement the mudaraba financing and a new institution that operates differently from the participation banks must be established in order to implement this model in a sustainable manner. In the last section, policy recommendations have been presented in order to increase the applicability of mudaraba financing.
基于道德风险的参与型银行穆达拉巴融资实施评价——以土耳其为例
劳资伙伴关系是一种有利于社会发展的融资模式。虽然mudaraba融资是无息金融体系的一个很好的替代方案,但在参与式银行提供资金、客户提供劳动力的形式下,参与式银行的实施比例很低。这种情况在文献中没有得到必要的处理,提出的建议也很肤浅。本研究旨在从参与银行的角度来评估可能的原因,以提高人们的认识。该研究认为,mudaraba融资对参与银行构成道德风险,并在道德风险与法律基础设施、非正式交易、商业成熟度水平、经济形势和审计概念之间关系的框架内,通过对该领域专家进行半结构化访谈来评估这一说法。由于访谈和随后的评估,得出的结论是,参与银行不具备实施mudaraba融资的基础设施,必须建立一个与参与银行不同的新机构,以便以可持续的方式实施这一模式。在最后一节中,提出了政策建议,以增加mudaraba融资的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信