ATTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SIMULATION PROGRAM TOWARDS BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS

Adeeb Sidani, Osama Omar
{"title":"ATTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SIMULATION PROGRAM TOWARDS BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS","authors":"Adeeb Sidani, Osama Omar","doi":"10.54729/2789-8547.1085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Global Warming is one of the greatest environmental threats of the 21st century. Many parties around the world like governments, corporations, and researchers, etc. are working hard to find solutions. Architectural education is concerned with global warming issues, and trying to achieve reliable design related solutions for a sustainable environment. Majority of the students use simulation programs to determine with accuracy some variables that can support designers to take decisions about the best strategies to apply for any type of building. These simulation programs are usually selected based on their straightforward and user-friendly interface. The most common programs among architecture students at the Beirut Arab University are Ecotect, DesignBuilder and CFD. However, not all the results are precise nor are they based on an accurate scientific basis. This paper will discuss the scientific background, interface, and capability of these programs. In addition compare them in order to establish their differences, besides a brief overview about energy simulation concepts. In addition the research will conduct a survey measuring the awareness and benefit of the three programs among students as a design decision supporting tool. Furthermore students that already implemented these programs in their design will be selected, to show how they dealt with these programs and how these programs interfered with their design decision making. The selection of the students will show the appropriate year to add this program as a supporting tool for architectural design studio.","PeriodicalId":113089,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ)","volume":"24 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8547.1085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Global Warming is one of the greatest environmental threats of the 21st century. Many parties around the world like governments, corporations, and researchers, etc. are working hard to find solutions. Architectural education is concerned with global warming issues, and trying to achieve reliable design related solutions for a sustainable environment. Majority of the students use simulation programs to determine with accuracy some variables that can support designers to take decisions about the best strategies to apply for any type of building. These simulation programs are usually selected based on their straightforward and user-friendly interface. The most common programs among architecture students at the Beirut Arab University are Ecotect, DesignBuilder and CFD. However, not all the results are precise nor are they based on an accurate scientific basis. This paper will discuss the scientific background, interface, and capability of these programs. In addition compare them in order to establish their differences, besides a brief overview about energy simulation concepts. In addition the research will conduct a survey measuring the awareness and benefit of the three programs among students as a design decision supporting tool. Furthermore students that already implemented these programs in their design will be selected, to show how they dealt with these programs and how these programs interfered with their design decision making. The selection of the students will show the appropriate year to add this program as a supporting tool for architectural design studio.
获得适当的模拟程序,以实现更好的环境决策
全球变暖是21世纪最大的环境威胁之一。世界各地的许多方面,如政府、公司和研究人员等,都在努力寻找解决方案。建筑教育关注全球变暖问题,并试图为可持续发展的环境实现可靠的设计相关解决方案。大多数学生使用模拟程序来准确地确定一些变量,这些变量可以帮助设计师做出关于适用于任何类型建筑的最佳策略的决定。这些仿真程序通常是基于它们的直接和用户友好的界面来选择的。贝鲁特阿拉伯大学建筑系学生中最常见的项目是Ecotect、DesignBuilder和CFD。然而,并非所有的结果都是精确的,也不是基于准确的科学基础。本文将讨论这些程序的科学背景、接口和功能。除了对能量模拟概念的简要概述外,还对它们进行了比较,以确定它们之间的差异。此外,本研究还将进行一项调查,以衡量学生对这三个项目的认识和收益,作为设计决策支持工具。此外,将选择已经在设计中实现这些程序的学生,以展示他们如何处理这些程序以及这些程序如何干扰他们的设计决策。学生的选择将显示适当的年份添加这个程序作为建筑设计工作室的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信