{"title":"'As long as’, ‘until’ and ‘before’ clauses","authors":"Bernhard Wälchli","doi":"10.32798/bl.372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ clauses in the Baltic languages in their wider areal and genealogical context in a sample of 72 modern and ancient doculects of European and Indo-European languages. In a bottom-up construction of the semantic map of ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ connectors from parallel text data, a fourth cluster intermediate between ‘before’ and ‘until’ with negative main clauses is identified. The typology resulting from the different overlaps of clusters locates Baltic languages in an intermediate zone between Western, Eastern, and Northern European languages. This goes hand-in-hand with a high diversity of Baltic languages in their typology of ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ clauses. The temporal connectors found in Baltic varieties can be classified according to whether they originate from strategies expressing temporal identity (simultaneity) or non-identity (non-simultaneity). Many connectors in Baltic derive from correlative constructions and originally express identity, but can then shift from simultaneity towards posteriority as they gradually lose their association with correlative constructions. Since temporal clauses are never atemporal and are hence incompatible with permanent states and since negation often expresses permanent states, negation—a marker of non-identity—is prone to develop non-polarity functions in ‘before’ and ‘until’ clauses. The Baltic and Slavic languages are rich in various kinds of expanded negation (translation equivalents in other languages lack negation) and expletive negation (negation does not have the function of expressing negative polarity) in ‘before’ and ‘until’ clauses. However, indefinite negative pronouns often retain their negative semantic value when standard negation in temporal clauses is expanded and semantically bleached.","PeriodicalId":367960,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32798/bl.372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
This paper investigates ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ clauses in the Baltic languages in their wider areal and genealogical context in a sample of 72 modern and ancient doculects of European and Indo-European languages. In a bottom-up construction of the semantic map of ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ connectors from parallel text data, a fourth cluster intermediate between ‘before’ and ‘until’ with negative main clauses is identified. The typology resulting from the different overlaps of clusters locates Baltic languages in an intermediate zone between Western, Eastern, and Northern European languages. This goes hand-in-hand with a high diversity of Baltic languages in their typology of ‘before’, ‘until’ and ‘as long as’ clauses. The temporal connectors found in Baltic varieties can be classified according to whether they originate from strategies expressing temporal identity (simultaneity) or non-identity (non-simultaneity). Many connectors in Baltic derive from correlative constructions and originally express identity, but can then shift from simultaneity towards posteriority as they gradually lose their association with correlative constructions. Since temporal clauses are never atemporal and are hence incompatible with permanent states and since negation often expresses permanent states, negation—a marker of non-identity—is prone to develop non-polarity functions in ‘before’ and ‘until’ clauses. The Baltic and Slavic languages are rich in various kinds of expanded negation (translation equivalents in other languages lack negation) and expletive negation (negation does not have the function of expressing negative polarity) in ‘before’ and ‘until’ clauses. However, indefinite negative pronouns often retain their negative semantic value when standard negation in temporal clauses is expanded and semantically bleached.
本文对波罗的海语言中“before”、“until”和“as long as”的从句在更广泛的地域和系谱背景下进行了研究,样本为72份欧洲和印欧语言的现代和古代文献。在一个由“before”、“until”和“as long as”连接词组成的语义图的自底向上结构中,我们确定了第四个介于“before”和“until”之间的簇,其中包含否定主句。由不同的集群重叠产生的类型学将波罗的海语言定位在西欧、东欧和北欧语言之间的中间区域。这与波罗的海语言中“before”、“until”和“as long as”从句的高度多样性密切相关。在波罗的海的变体中发现的时间连接器可以根据它们是源于表达时间同一性(同时性)还是非同一性(非同时性)的策略来分类。波罗的海语中的许多连接词源于相关结构,最初表达身份,但随着它们逐渐失去与相关结构的联系,它们可以从同时性转向后发性。由于时间分句从来不是非时间的,因此与永久状态不相容,由于否定通常表达永久状态,否定——非同一性的标志——容易在“之前”和“直到”分句中发展出非极性功能。波罗的海语和斯拉夫语在“before”和“until”分句中有丰富的各种扩展否定(其他语言的翻译对等物缺乏否定)和咒骂否定(否定不具有表达否定极性的功能)。然而,当时态分句中的标准否定被扩展和语义漂白时,不确定否定代词往往保留了其否定语义价值。