Associative memory comparison for target identification

D. Banton, M. A. Mehalic
{"title":"Associative memory comparison for target identification","authors":"D. Banton, M. A. Mehalic","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.1993.290926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the execution speed comparison of two associative memory organizations used to identify weapon platforms from intercepted radar emanations. The two associative memory organizations were chosen because of their fundamentally different levels of processing granularity. The CAM was chosen because its processing is performed within the memory cell, while the bit-serial word-parallel associative memory was chosen because its processing is performed at the memory word level. Both organizations were designed, modelled and simulated to determine which was the faster in comparing 8-bit, and 32-bit target parameters. The associative memories were designed to store the parameters of at least 72 weapon platforms, with each platform consisting of six parameters, and each parameter consisting of an upper and lower limit. The number of bits per word and the number of words within the memory were varied to accommodate the target parameters and to enhance the comparison speed. The comparison speed was calculated by summing the critical path delays through each memory. The comparison speed results indicate which associative memory organization is the more appropriate for identifying the weapon platform.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":183796,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference-NAECON 1993","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference-NAECON 1993","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1993.290926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the execution speed comparison of two associative memory organizations used to identify weapon platforms from intercepted radar emanations. The two associative memory organizations were chosen because of their fundamentally different levels of processing granularity. The CAM was chosen because its processing is performed within the memory cell, while the bit-serial word-parallel associative memory was chosen because its processing is performed at the memory word level. Both organizations were designed, modelled and simulated to determine which was the faster in comparing 8-bit, and 32-bit target parameters. The associative memories were designed to store the parameters of at least 72 weapon platforms, with each platform consisting of six parameters, and each parameter consisting of an upper and lower limit. The number of bits per word and the number of words within the memory were varied to accommodate the target parameters and to enhance the comparison speed. The comparison speed was calculated by summing the critical path delays through each memory. The comparison speed results indicate which associative memory organization is the more appropriate for identifying the weapon platform.<>
目标识别的联想记忆比较
本文介绍了两种关联存储器组织在拦截雷达信号中识别武器平台的执行速度比较。之所以选择这两种联想记忆组织,是因为它们的处理粒度级别根本不同。之所以选择CAM是因为它的处理是在存储器单元内执行的,而选择位串行字并行联想存储器是因为它的处理是在存储器字级执行的。我们对这两种组织进行了设计、建模和模拟,以确定哪一种组织在比较8位和32位目标参数时速度更快。联想存储器被设计用于存储至少72个武器平台的参数,每个平台由6个参数组成,每个参数由一个上限和下限组成。为了适应目标参数和提高比较速度,每个字的位数和内存中的字数是不同的。比较速度是通过对每个内存的关键路径延迟求和来计算的。比较速度结果表明,哪种联想记忆组织更适合识别武器平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信