{"title":"LAWS AS RELATIONS:","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1q26ntn.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The techniques for proving general laws about relations are similar to those for proving laws of classes. As an example, let’s show that the converse R̆ of any transitive relation R is itself transitive: Let R be any transitive relation, and let x, y, and z be any values in the universe of discourse. Suppose that x bears R̆ to y and y bears R̆ to z. Then, by the definition of ‘converse’, y bears R to x and z bears R to y. Hence, since R is transitive, z also bears R to x. Therefore, again by the definition of ‘converse’, x bears R̆ to z. Since x bears R̆ to z whenever x bears R̆ to y and y bears R̆ to z, R̆ is transitive. Thus the converse of any transitive relation is transitive. Some of the laws of relations state logical connections among properties of relations:","PeriodicalId":208281,"journal":{"name":"The Mind of God and the Works of Nature","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mind of God and the Works of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q26ntn.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The techniques for proving general laws about relations are similar to those for proving laws of classes. As an example, let’s show that the converse R̆ of any transitive relation R is itself transitive: Let R be any transitive relation, and let x, y, and z be any values in the universe of discourse. Suppose that x bears R̆ to y and y bears R̆ to z. Then, by the definition of ‘converse’, y bears R to x and z bears R to y. Hence, since R is transitive, z also bears R to x. Therefore, again by the definition of ‘converse’, x bears R̆ to z. Since x bears R̆ to z whenever x bears R̆ to y and y bears R̆ to z, R̆ is transitive. Thus the converse of any transitive relation is transitive. Some of the laws of relations state logical connections among properties of relations: