Procedural and Substantive Judicial Review of the Right to Health in Brazil

R. Perlingeiro
{"title":"Procedural and Substantive Judicial Review of the Right to Health in Brazil","authors":"R. Perlingeiro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2481539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"La versione italiana di questo documento e disponibile all'indirizzo: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481592La version en espanol de este articulo esta disponible en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2439008A versao em portugues deste artigo esta disponivel em: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2363398This text seeks to identify the objective and subjective aspects of rights to an existential minimum in health care, based on international parameters which, because they are restricted to internal scope of a nation, depend on a constitutional basis and on comprehensible facts, the demonstration of which should be the responsibility of the national administrative authority. Regarding the judicial review of the minimum right to healthcare, this paper points out that it is a serious mistake to try to handle public health conflicts according to the typical judicial principles governing conflicts under private law, because that distorts the public health system, with judicial orders that depart from the universal access to health care and that are often impossible to comply with. The article concludes that the judicial review of administrative authorities in matters involving the right to health necessarily requires simultaneous judicial review of the corresponding administrative procedures.","PeriodicalId":324969,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Latin America & the Caribbean (Development) (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Latin America & the Caribbean (Development) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2481539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

La versione italiana di questo documento e disponibile all'indirizzo: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481592La version en espanol de este articulo esta disponible en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2439008A versao em portugues deste artigo esta disponivel em: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2363398This text seeks to identify the objective and subjective aspects of rights to an existential minimum in health care, based on international parameters which, because they are restricted to internal scope of a nation, depend on a constitutional basis and on comprehensible facts, the demonstration of which should be the responsibility of the national administrative authority. Regarding the judicial review of the minimum right to healthcare, this paper points out that it is a serious mistake to try to handle public health conflicts according to the typical judicial principles governing conflicts under private law, because that distorts the public health system, with judicial orders that depart from the universal access to health care and that are often impossible to comply with. The article concludes that the judicial review of administrative authorities in matters involving the right to health necessarily requires simultaneous judicial review of the corresponding administrative procedures.
巴西对健康权的程序和实体司法审查
关于文件的问题的意大利文版:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481592La关于文件的问题的西班牙文版:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2439008A关于文件的问题的葡萄牙文版:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2363398This的案文试图根据国际参数确定最低限度的生存保健权利的客观和主观方面,这些参数由于限于一个国家的内部范围,取决于宪法基础和可理解的事实,证明这些事实应由国家行政当局负责。关于最低医疗保健权的司法审查,本文指出,试图按照典型的私法管辖冲突的司法原则来处理公共卫生冲突是一个严重的错误,因为这扭曲了公共卫生制度,司法命令偏离了普遍享有医疗保健的原则,而且往往无法遵守。该条的结论是,行政当局对涉及健康权的事项进行司法审查,必须同时对相应的行政程序进行司法审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信