Distributed Kanban with Limited Geographical Distance: Analyzing Lean Principles Pull, Work in Progress and Kaizen

Raoul Vallon, S. Strobl, M. Ras, Mario Bernhart, T. Grechenig
{"title":"Distributed Kanban with Limited Geographical Distance: Analyzing Lean Principles Pull, Work in Progress and Kaizen","authors":"Raoul Vallon, S. Strobl, M. Ras, Mario Bernhart, T. Grechenig","doi":"10.5220/0007626302100217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the software development methodology Kanban, which refers and relates to the concepts and ideas of Lean Manufacturing originating in the Japanese automobile industry, was initially developed and used within distributed teams, correlating research is lacking, incomplete and relatively young as a field. This paper addresses the need for research in this field and investigates three specific aspects of Kanban in distributed teams: Pull System, Work In Progress Limit and the concept of Kaizen culture (continuous improvement) narrowed by the distribution, size and life cycle of the team. Our qualitative methodology is based on a case study where empirical data was collected through the use of semi-structured expert interviews. The evaluative strategy is qualitative content analysis. The results of this study show that challenges and complications result from the use of Kanban, but it is effective within distributed teams. The observed challenges are discussed in detail and we conclude with eight recommendations for practicing Kanban in a distributed team as well as indicators for future research directions.","PeriodicalId":420861,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0007626302100217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the software development methodology Kanban, which refers and relates to the concepts and ideas of Lean Manufacturing originating in the Japanese automobile industry, was initially developed and used within distributed teams, correlating research is lacking, incomplete and relatively young as a field. This paper addresses the need for research in this field and investigates three specific aspects of Kanban in distributed teams: Pull System, Work In Progress Limit and the concept of Kaizen culture (continuous improvement) narrowed by the distribution, size and life cycle of the team. Our qualitative methodology is based on a case study where empirical data was collected through the use of semi-structured expert interviews. The evaluative strategy is qualitative content analysis. The results of this study show that challenges and complications result from the use of Kanban, but it is effective within distributed teams. The observed challenges are discussed in detail and we conclude with eight recommendations for practicing Kanban in a distributed team as well as indicators for future research directions.
地理距离有限的分布式看板:分析精益原则、拉动式、在制品和改善
虽然软件开发方法论看板最初是在分布式团队中开发和使用的,它涉及并涉及起源于日本汽车工业的精益制造的概念和思想,但相关的研究是缺乏的,不完整的,而且作为一个领域相对年轻。本文阐述了这一领域的研究需求,并研究了分布式团队中看板的三个具体方面:拉式系统、在制品限制以及随着团队的分布、规模和生命周期而缩小的Kaizen文化(持续改进)的概念。我们的定性方法是基于一个案例研究,其中经验数据是通过使用半结构化的专家访谈收集的。评价策略是定性的内容分析。这项研究的结果表明,挑战和复杂性来自于看板的使用,但它在分布式团队中是有效的。我们详细讨论了观察到的挑战,并总结了在分布式团队中实践看板的八个建议,以及未来研究方向的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信