Comparison of lidar's characteristics at different flying height

Qiong Ding, Wu Chen, B. King, Yanxiong Liu
{"title":"Comparison of lidar's characteristics at different flying height","authors":"Qiong Ding, Wu Chen, B. King, Yanxiong Liu","doi":"10.1117/12.912611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the cost of LiDAR equipment is high and different projects prefer different goals, the flying scheme needs to be strict planned to save cost and energy. In this study, LiDAR's ability at different flying height was tested. Two trials with different flying height are compared. Analysis was conducted by considering the relative accuracy, intensity and penetration ability to find out the difference of two trials. The result shows the relative accuracy between these two trials is 0.37 m. True relative accuracy is achieved when removing canopy as large interpolation errors often exist at places with great slope changes like the canopy. Intensity values decrease greatly with the increase of flying height due to the longer travel distance and more energy loss in atmosphere. Statistical results showed that in each trial high intensity is apt to be from low canopy and only return. LiDAR vegetation penetration ability decreased greatly at low vegetation due to the enlarged footprint and weakened energy, but it doesn't change on large vegetation.","PeriodicalId":194292,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Lidar and Radar Mapping Technologies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Lidar and Radar Mapping Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.912611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the cost of LiDAR equipment is high and different projects prefer different goals, the flying scheme needs to be strict planned to save cost and energy. In this study, LiDAR's ability at different flying height was tested. Two trials with different flying height are compared. Analysis was conducted by considering the relative accuracy, intensity and penetration ability to find out the difference of two trials. The result shows the relative accuracy between these two trials is 0.37 m. True relative accuracy is achieved when removing canopy as large interpolation errors often exist at places with great slope changes like the canopy. Intensity values decrease greatly with the increase of flying height due to the longer travel distance and more energy loss in atmosphere. Statistical results showed that in each trial high intensity is apt to be from low canopy and only return. LiDAR vegetation penetration ability decreased greatly at low vegetation due to the enlarged footprint and weakened energy, but it doesn't change on large vegetation.
不同飞行高度激光雷达特性比较
由于激光雷达设备成本高,不同的项目目标不同,需要严格规划飞行方案,以节省成本和能源。本研究测试了激光雷达在不同飞行高度下的能力。对两种不同飞行高度的试验进行了比较。从相对精度、强度、穿透能力等方面进行分析,找出两试验的差异。结果表明,两次试验的相对精度为0.37 m。由于像冠层这样坡度变化较大的地方往往存在较大的插值误差,因此在去除冠层时可以获得真正的相对精度。随着飞行高度的增加,由于飞行距离的增加和大气中能量损失的增加,强度值大大降低。统计结果表明,在各试验中,高强度往往来自低冠层,只返回。在低植被条件下,激光雷达穿透植被的能力由于足迹增大和能量减弱而大幅下降,而在大植被条件下则没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信