Patients-The ultimate winners of multidisciplinary rounding.

Maureen Kroning, Kenneth Janowski, Bijo Chacko, A. Foran
{"title":"Patients-The ultimate winners of multidisciplinary rounding.","authors":"Maureen Kroning, Kenneth Janowski, Bijo Chacko, A. Foran","doi":"10.1097/01.NUMA.0000579028.63352.fa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A ccording to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, multidisciplinary rounds allow healthcare workers to come together to share their expertise with the goal of improving both the quality and safety of patient care.1 Multidisciplinary rounding is known to increase positive patient outcomes and decrease the “silo effect” through improved communication between healthcare disciplines, leading to better patient and staff satisfaction.2,3 In a healthcare system that’s often chaotic and fragmented, multidisciplinary rounds not only help foster teamwork, but also increase the healthcare team’s awareness of the patient’s care plan and their ability to communicate the care plan to the patient and his or her and family.1 At our hospital, the CCUs had successfully utilized multidisciplinary rounding for over 6 years; patient satisfaction scores for communication with doctors, communication with nurses, and discharge planning were higher on the CCUs compared with the medical units that hadn’t incorporated multidisciplinary rounding. Staff members present for multidisciplinary rounding on the CCUs included, but weren’t limited to, the patient’s primary RN and licensed independent practitioner, the chief medical officer (CMO), the nurse manager, the pharmacist, and the case manager. During rounding, the areas of care reviewed included the medication regimen, indication for use of central line and indwelling urinary catheters, the patient’s length of stay, any psychological and social concerns, and the patient’s discharge plan. A pilot team was formed to implement multidisciplinary rounding on a busy telemetry unit. The team developed goals and utilized","PeriodicalId":358194,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Management (springhouse)","volume":"16 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Management (springhouse)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000579028.63352.fa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A ccording to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, multidisciplinary rounds allow healthcare workers to come together to share their expertise with the goal of improving both the quality and safety of patient care.1 Multidisciplinary rounding is known to increase positive patient outcomes and decrease the “silo effect” through improved communication between healthcare disciplines, leading to better patient and staff satisfaction.2,3 In a healthcare system that’s often chaotic and fragmented, multidisciplinary rounds not only help foster teamwork, but also increase the healthcare team’s awareness of the patient’s care plan and their ability to communicate the care plan to the patient and his or her and family.1 At our hospital, the CCUs had successfully utilized multidisciplinary rounding for over 6 years; patient satisfaction scores for communication with doctors, communication with nurses, and discharge planning were higher on the CCUs compared with the medical units that hadn’t incorporated multidisciplinary rounding. Staff members present for multidisciplinary rounding on the CCUs included, but weren’t limited to, the patient’s primary RN and licensed independent practitioner, the chief medical officer (CMO), the nurse manager, the pharmacist, and the case manager. During rounding, the areas of care reviewed included the medication regimen, indication for use of central line and indwelling urinary catheters, the patient’s length of stay, any psychological and social concerns, and the patient’s discharge plan. A pilot team was formed to implement multidisciplinary rounding on a busy telemetry unit. The team developed goals and utilized
病人——多学科围捕的最终赢家。
根据医疗保健改进研究所的说法,多学科查房使医疗保健工作者能够聚集在一起,分享他们的专业知识,以提高患者护理的质量和安全性已知多学科舍入可以提高患者的积极结果,并通过改善医疗保健学科之间的沟通减少“筒仓效应”,从而提高患者和工作人员的满意度。2,3在一个经常混乱和分散的医疗保健系统中,多学科查房不仅有助于培养团队合作,而且还可以提高医疗保健团队对患者护理计划的认识,以及他们与患者及其家人沟通护理计划的能力在我们医院,ccu已经成功地利用多学科查房超过6年;CCUs患者在与医生沟通、与护士沟通和出院计划方面的满意度得分高于未采用多学科舍入的医疗单位。参加ccu多学科查房的工作人员包括但不限于患者的主要注册护士和有执照的独立医生、首席医疗官(CMO)、护士经理、药剂师和病例管理员。在查房期间,审查的护理领域包括药物治疗方案,使用中心静脉导管和留置导尿管的指征,患者的住院时间,任何心理和社会问题,以及患者的出院计划。成立了一个试点小组,在一个繁忙的遥测单位实施多学科围捕。团队制定目标并加以利用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信