Innovator’s Dilemma: Review of the Main Responses to Disruptive Innovation

Nizar M. Benazzouz
{"title":"Innovator’s Dilemma: Review of the Main Responses to Disruptive Innovation","authors":"Nizar M. Benazzouz","doi":"10.2478/joim-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This paper aims to summarize and discuss key findings in the literature around the main responses used by incumbents in order to anticipate or counter-attack disruptive up-starters and hence to partially or totally tackle the innovator’s dilemma. Methodology: The research method is based on critical and comparative literature review. Hence, by narrowing down the scope of studies papers using a multi-stage selection process, this paper discusses other scholars’ research and findings on the topic of disruption innovation and the directions well-established firms choose to avoid being disrupted. Findings: This paper enumerated some main strategies invoked in a finely selected literature advised for incumbents wiling to escape disruptive threats. It suggests that these strategies share a common exploitation/exploration basis but are implemented in distinct ways and have different impacts across the organization. It also discovered many missing parts in the literature that stand for interesting research opportunities. Value added: This literature review contributes to the current body of knowledge by providing an overview of the main incumbents’ responses to disruptive threats. It also identifies some current gaps in research and provides recommendations on how to close them. Recommendations: This paper builds on hitherto literature in order to present state-of-the art approaches to disrupt or resist disruption. It categorizes these responses into internal and external, and proactive vs. reactive. While these strategies are studied in different contexts and are labeled distinctly, this study proposes a common frame displaying a similar underlying purpose to all of them. It also provides some updated research avenues for scholars to inspect.","PeriodicalId":302686,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercultural Management","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercultural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This paper aims to summarize and discuss key findings in the literature around the main responses used by incumbents in order to anticipate or counter-attack disruptive up-starters and hence to partially or totally tackle the innovator’s dilemma. Methodology: The research method is based on critical and comparative literature review. Hence, by narrowing down the scope of studies papers using a multi-stage selection process, this paper discusses other scholars’ research and findings on the topic of disruption innovation and the directions well-established firms choose to avoid being disrupted. Findings: This paper enumerated some main strategies invoked in a finely selected literature advised for incumbents wiling to escape disruptive threats. It suggests that these strategies share a common exploitation/exploration basis but are implemented in distinct ways and have different impacts across the organization. It also discovered many missing parts in the literature that stand for interesting research opportunities. Value added: This literature review contributes to the current body of knowledge by providing an overview of the main incumbents’ responses to disruptive threats. It also identifies some current gaps in research and provides recommendations on how to close them. Recommendations: This paper builds on hitherto literature in order to present state-of-the art approaches to disrupt or resist disruption. It categorizes these responses into internal and external, and proactive vs. reactive. While these strategies are studied in different contexts and are labeled distinctly, this study proposes a common frame displaying a similar underlying purpose to all of them. It also provides some updated research avenues for scholars to inspect.
创新者的困境:对破坏性创新的主要回应述评
摘要目的:本文旨在总结和讨论现有企业为预测或反击破坏性初创企业而采用的主要应对措施,从而部分或完全解决创新者困境的主要研究成果。研究方法:研究方法基于批判性和比较文献综述。因此,通过使用多阶段选择过程缩小研究论文的范围,本文讨论了其他学者关于颠覆性创新主题的研究和发现,以及成熟企业选择避免被颠覆的方向。研究结果:本文列举了一些主要的策略,这些策略是在精心挑选的文献中为愿意逃避破坏性威胁的现任者提供的建议。它表明,这些策略共享一个共同的开发/探索基础,但以不同的方式实现,并在整个组织中产生不同的影响。它还发现了许多文献中缺失的部分,这些部分代表着有趣的研究机会。附加价值:本文献综述通过提供主要在位者对破坏性威胁的反应的概述,为当前的知识体系做出了贡献。它还指出了目前研究中的一些差距,并就如何缩小这些差距提出了建议。建议:本文以迄今为止的文献为基础,以呈现最先进的方法来破坏或抵制破坏。它将这些反应分为内部和外部,主动和被动。虽然这些策略在不同的背景下被研究,并被明确地标记,但本研究提出了一个共同的框架,显示了所有这些策略的相似的潜在目的。这也为学者们提供了一些新的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信