Contested Frontiers: Territory and Power in Euclides da Cunha’s Amazonian Texts

Cinthya Torres
{"title":"Contested Frontiers: Territory and Power in Euclides da Cunha’s Amazonian Texts","authors":"Cinthya Torres","doi":"10.3828/LIVERPOOL/9781786941831.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the political and discursive mechanisms Brazilian writer Da Cunha employs to build a historical past for Brazil in the Amazon, while simultaneously discrediting Bolivia and Peru’s territorial demands on the Acre region in Amazonia. Building his argument on boundary-making history, cartographical data, and nationalistic feelings, Torres argues that Da Cunha crafts a compelling case for Brazil’s rightful purchase of Acre and expansion of its frontiers in two ways. Firstly, Da Cunha identifies the value of the Amazon, whether as a political, economic, or even symbolic capital that can be utilized to lay the grounds for a diplomatic defense, and therefore lawfulness of their territorial claims. Secondly, Torres goes on to argue that Da Cunha is aware of the decisive nature of his mission for the mapping of a terrain visited only by local Indians and Peruvian rubber tappers. This consciousness leads him to compose a history for Brazil in the Amazon with the intention of nationalizing the territory; in other words, to turn an abstract and alien place into one concrete narrative in which the uprooted nation is reunited and homogenized under a common and shared identity.","PeriodicalId":178051,"journal":{"name":"Intimate Frontiers","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intimate Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/LIVERPOOL/9781786941831.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay explores the political and discursive mechanisms Brazilian writer Da Cunha employs to build a historical past for Brazil in the Amazon, while simultaneously discrediting Bolivia and Peru’s territorial demands on the Acre region in Amazonia. Building his argument on boundary-making history, cartographical data, and nationalistic feelings, Torres argues that Da Cunha crafts a compelling case for Brazil’s rightful purchase of Acre and expansion of its frontiers in two ways. Firstly, Da Cunha identifies the value of the Amazon, whether as a political, economic, or even symbolic capital that can be utilized to lay the grounds for a diplomatic defense, and therefore lawfulness of their territorial claims. Secondly, Torres goes on to argue that Da Cunha is aware of the decisive nature of his mission for the mapping of a terrain visited only by local Indians and Peruvian rubber tappers. This consciousness leads him to compose a history for Brazil in the Amazon with the intention of nationalizing the territory; in other words, to turn an abstract and alien place into one concrete narrative in which the uprooted nation is reunited and homogenized under a common and shared identity.
有争议的边界:欧几里得斯·达·库尼亚亚马逊文本中的领土和权力
本文探讨巴西作家达·库尼亚在亚马逊建立巴西历史的政治和话语机制,同时质疑玻利维亚和秘鲁对亚马逊阿克地区的领土要求。托雷斯将他的论点建立在边界划定的历史、地图数据和民族主义情绪上,他认为达库尼亚为巴西合法购买阿克并以两种方式扩张其边界提供了令人信服的理由。首先,达库尼亚确定了亚马逊的价值,无论是作为政治、经济,甚至是象征性的资本,都可以用来为外交辩护奠定基础,从而使他们的领土要求合法。其次,托雷斯接着说,达库尼亚意识到他的任务的决定性,即绘制只有当地印第安人和秘鲁橡胶采掘者才会访问的地形。这种意识促使他为亚马逊地区的巴西撰写历史,意图将这片土地国有化;换句话说,把一个抽象和陌生的地方变成一个具体的叙述,在这个叙述中,被连根拔起的国家在一个共同和共享的身份下重新统一和同质化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信