How patterns of students dashboard use are related to their achievement and self-regulatory engagement

Fatemeh Salehian Kia, Stephanie D. Teasley, M. Hatala, S. Karabenick, Matthew Kay
{"title":"How patterns of students dashboard use are related to their achievement and self-regulatory engagement","authors":"Fatemeh Salehian Kia, Stephanie D. Teasley, M. Hatala, S. Karabenick, Matthew Kay","doi":"10.1145/3375462.3375472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of student-facing dashboards is to support learning by providing students with actionable information and promoting self-regulated learning. We created a new dashboard design aligned with SRL theory, called MyLA, to better understand how students use a learning analytics tool. We conducted sequence analysis on students' interactions with three different visualizations in the dashboard, implemented in a LMS, for a large number of students (860) in ten courses representing different disciplines. To evaluate different students' experiences with the dashboard, we computed chi-squared tests of independence on dashboard users (52%) to find frequent patterns that discriminate students by their differences in academic achievement and self-regulated learning behaviors. The results revealed discriminating patterns in dashboard use among different levels of academic achievement and self-regulated learning, particularly for low achieving students and high self-regulated learners. Our findings highlight the importance of differences in students' experience with a student-facing dashboard, and emphasize that one size does not fit all in the design of learning analytics tools.","PeriodicalId":355800,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The aim of student-facing dashboards is to support learning by providing students with actionable information and promoting self-regulated learning. We created a new dashboard design aligned with SRL theory, called MyLA, to better understand how students use a learning analytics tool. We conducted sequence analysis on students' interactions with three different visualizations in the dashboard, implemented in a LMS, for a large number of students (860) in ten courses representing different disciplines. To evaluate different students' experiences with the dashboard, we computed chi-squared tests of independence on dashboard users (52%) to find frequent patterns that discriminate students by their differences in academic achievement and self-regulated learning behaviors. The results revealed discriminating patterns in dashboard use among different levels of academic achievement and self-regulated learning, particularly for low achieving students and high self-regulated learners. Our findings highlight the importance of differences in students' experience with a student-facing dashboard, and emphasize that one size does not fit all in the design of learning analytics tools.
学生使用仪表板的模式如何与他们的成就和自我监管参与相关
面向学生的仪表板的目的是通过为学生提供可操作的信息和促进自主学习来支持学习。我们根据SRL理论创建了一个新的仪表板设计,称为MyLA,以更好地了解学生如何使用学习分析工具。我们对代表不同学科的10门课程的大量学生(860名)在LMS中实现的仪表板中与三种不同可视化的学生交互进行了序列分析。为了评估不同学生使用仪表板的体验,我们计算了仪表板用户独立性的卡方检验(52%),以发现通过学业成绩和自我调节学习行为差异来区分学生的常见模式。结果揭示了不同学习成绩和自主学习水平的学生在仪表板使用上的区别模式,特别是在学习成绩低和自主学习能力强的学生中。我们的研究结果强调了学生在使用面向学生的仪表板时体验差异的重要性,并强调在学习分析工具的设计中,一种尺寸并不适合所有人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信