Penerapan Asas Praduga Tidak Bersalah (Presumption of Innocent) Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Tingkat Penyidikan

Ahmad Faiz Alamsyah, Sidik Sunaryo, Yaris Adhial Fajrin
{"title":"Penerapan Asas Praduga Tidak Bersalah (Presumption of Innocent) Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Tingkat Penyidikan","authors":"Ahmad Faiz Alamsyah, Sidik Sunaryo, Yaris Adhial Fajrin","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.22395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of the presumption of innocence is one of the principles regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The application of the principle of the presumption of innocence is closely related to the application of rights to individuals, for example to suspects in the crime of theft who are in the process of being investigated. The regulation of these rights is regulated concretely in the Criminal Procedure Code. However, despite this, the application of the principle of the presumption of innocence in this case the application of the rights of the suspect during the arrest and detention process is still not given much attention by police investigators. Therefore, the researcher raised two problem formulations. First, how is the application of every person arrested for committing the crime of theft to be considered innocent until there is an Inkracht Decision at the Pamekasan Police Resort. Second, how is the application of every person who is detained for the crime of theft must be considered innocent until the Inckracht Decision is made by the Pamekasan Resort Police. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. It can be concluded that in the application of rights in the arrest process, two rights have not been implemented by the Pamekasan Police investigators, namely the suspect's right to ask the investigator to show an arrest warrant (Article 18 paragraph (1) KUHAP) and regarding the right for the family of the arrested suspect to receive a copy of the letter. an immediate arrest order (article 18 paragraph (3) KUHAP). While in the detention process, two rights have not been implemented, namely those related to the suspect's right to give information freely (article 52 KUHAP) and the suspect's right to obtain legal assistance and law enforcers are required to appoint legal counsel (article 54 KUHAP)","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.22395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The principle of the presumption of innocence is one of the principles regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The application of the principle of the presumption of innocence is closely related to the application of rights to individuals, for example to suspects in the crime of theft who are in the process of being investigated. The regulation of these rights is regulated concretely in the Criminal Procedure Code. However, despite this, the application of the principle of the presumption of innocence in this case the application of the rights of the suspect during the arrest and detention process is still not given much attention by police investigators. Therefore, the researcher raised two problem formulations. First, how is the application of every person arrested for committing the crime of theft to be considered innocent until there is an Inkracht Decision at the Pamekasan Police Resort. Second, how is the application of every person who is detained for the crime of theft must be considered innocent until the Inckracht Decision is made by the Pamekasan Resort Police. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. It can be concluded that in the application of rights in the arrest process, two rights have not been implemented by the Pamekasan Police investigators, namely the suspect's right to ask the investigator to show an arrest warrant (Article 18 paragraph (1) KUHAP) and regarding the right for the family of the arrested suspect to receive a copy of the letter. an immediate arrest order (article 18 paragraph (3) KUHAP). While in the detention process, two rights have not been implemented, namely those related to the suspect's right to give information freely (article 52 KUHAP) and the suspect's right to obtain legal assistance and law enforcers are required to appoint legal counsel (article 54 KUHAP)
无罪假设原则的应用在调查水平上
无罪推定原则是《刑事诉讼法》规定的原则之一。无罪推定原则的适用与个人权利的适用密切相关,例如对正在接受调查的盗窃犯罪嫌疑人的权利的适用。《刑事诉讼法》对这些权利的规定作了具体规定。然而,尽管如此,在本案中无罪推定原则的适用- -在逮捕和拘留过程中嫌疑犯权利的适用- -仍然没有得到警察调查人员的太多注意。因此,研究者提出了两种问题提法。第一,在帕梅卡桑警察度假村作出裁决之前,每个因犯盗窃罪而被捕的人的申请如何被视为无罪。第二,在帕梅卡桑旅游胜地警察作出Inckracht决定之前,每一个因盗窃罪被拘留的人的申请如何必须被认为是无辜的。所使用的研究方法是社会学法学方法。可以得出的结论是,在逮捕过程中权利的适用方面,帕梅卡桑警察调查人员没有执行两项权利,即嫌疑人要求调查人员出示逮捕令的权利(KUHAP第18条第(1)款)和关于被逮捕嫌疑人的家属收到信函副本的权利。立即逮捕令(《刑法》第18条第3款)。在拘留过程中,有两项权利没有得到落实,即与嫌疑人自由提供信息的权利有关的权利(《刑事诉讼法》第52条)和与嫌疑人获得法律援助和执法人员必须指定法律顾问有关的权利(《刑事诉讼法》第54条)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信