Laura Davison Mangilli, Fernanda Sassi, Thalita Suelyn Stafocher, C. D. Andrade
{"title":"Atuação fonoaudiológica em pacientes com síndrome da imunodeficiência adquirida e queixa de deglutição – análise retrospectiva de prontuários","authors":"Laura Davison Mangilli, Fernanda Sassi, Thalita Suelyn Stafocher, C. D. Andrade","doi":"10.1590/2317-6431-2015-1620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To verify and characterize the function of swallowing in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) patients with a complaint of dysphagia. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 17 AIDS patients treated in a school hospital between 2011 and 2012, who underwent a bedside evaluation and treatment of swallowing. The data were related to the results of the bedside evaluation that followed specific protocols, both at baseline and discharge. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) patients who completed the swallowing intervention during the admission (GCSI); and 2) patients who did not complete the swallowing intervention during the admission (GNCSI). Results The groups did not differ in age and gender. For the classification of swallowing: 1) both groups had significantly better scores at discharge compared to those at baseline (GNCSI: p=0.024; GCSI: p=0.011); 2) the scores did not differ between groups at baseline (p=0.349); 3) at discharge, the scores were different between groups (p=0.002), with better results in the GCSI group. The analysis of the clinical signs and symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia or penetration/aspiration indicated that in both groups, there was a statistically significant difference between baseline and discharge only in the presence of multiple swallows (a decrease in the number of swallows after intervention). Conclusion Swallowing ability improved after intervention. Additionally, clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of oropharyngeal dysphagia or penetration/aspiration resolved. The GCSI group showed better results than GNCSI after intervention.","PeriodicalId":439092,"journal":{"name":"Audiology - Communication Research","volume":"41 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology - Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2015-1620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Purpose To verify and characterize the function of swallowing in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) patients with a complaint of dysphagia. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 17 AIDS patients treated in a school hospital between 2011 and 2012, who underwent a bedside evaluation and treatment of swallowing. The data were related to the results of the bedside evaluation that followed specific protocols, both at baseline and discharge. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) patients who completed the swallowing intervention during the admission (GCSI); and 2) patients who did not complete the swallowing intervention during the admission (GNCSI). Results The groups did not differ in age and gender. For the classification of swallowing: 1) both groups had significantly better scores at discharge compared to those at baseline (GNCSI: p=0.024; GCSI: p=0.011); 2) the scores did not differ between groups at baseline (p=0.349); 3) at discharge, the scores were different between groups (p=0.002), with better results in the GCSI group. The analysis of the clinical signs and symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia or penetration/aspiration indicated that in both groups, there was a statistically significant difference between baseline and discharge only in the presence of multiple swallows (a decrease in the number of swallows after intervention). Conclusion Swallowing ability improved after intervention. Additionally, clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of oropharyngeal dysphagia or penetration/aspiration resolved. The GCSI group showed better results than GNCSI after intervention.
目的探讨以吞咽困难为主诉的获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)患者的吞咽功能。方法回顾性分析2011年至2012年在学校医院接受床边评估和吞咽治疗的17例艾滋病患者的医疗记录。这些数据与遵循特定方案的床边评估结果有关,包括基线和出院时。患者分为两组:1)入院时完成吞咽干预(GCSI)的患者;2)入院时未完成吞咽干预的患者(GNCSI)。结果两组无年龄、性别差异。在吞咽分类方面:1)两组患者出院时的评分均显著高于基线时(GNCSI: p=0.024;GCSI: p = 0.011);2)组间评分在基线时无差异(p=0.349);3)出院时,两组评分差异有统计学意义(p=0.002),以GCSI组效果较好。对口咽吞咽困难或渗透/误吸的临床体征和症状的分析表明,在两组中,仅在有多只燕子的情况下(干预后燕子数量减少),基线和出院时的差异有统计学意义。结论干预后患者吞咽能力有所改善。此外,提示口咽吞咽困难或渗透/吸入的临床体征和症状消失。干预后GCSI组效果优于GNCSI组。