Russia and China: Against the Storm

Mikhail Korostikov
{"title":"Russia and China: Against the Storm","authors":"Mikhail Korostikov","doi":"10.1080/13523279.2011.595355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The anti-recessionary policies and popular reactions to them that were followed in Russia and China between 2008 and 2010 differed significantly, even though the responses to the crisis followed a similar pattern in the two. The authorities in China, free of a need to take public opinion into account, responded more swiftly than those in Russia, but the packages of policies differed. As China's export markets dwindled, factories closed and millions of workers lost their jobs, so the government attempted to stimulate domestic demand and invest in infrastructure. In Russia, major investment in the financial sector dominated the response, and the government faced severe social responses, including strikes and demonstrations across the country. The results were comparable, but the crisis revealed different approaches of the two regimes in markedly different socio-economic circumstances.","PeriodicalId":206400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2011.595355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The anti-recessionary policies and popular reactions to them that were followed in Russia and China between 2008 and 2010 differed significantly, even though the responses to the crisis followed a similar pattern in the two. The authorities in China, free of a need to take public opinion into account, responded more swiftly than those in Russia, but the packages of policies differed. As China's export markets dwindled, factories closed and millions of workers lost their jobs, so the government attempted to stimulate domestic demand and invest in infrastructure. In Russia, major investment in the financial sector dominated the response, and the government faced severe social responses, including strikes and demonstrations across the country. The results were comparable, but the crisis revealed different approaches of the two regimes in markedly different socio-economic circumstances.
2008年至2010年间,俄罗斯和中国的反衰退政策和民众对这些政策的反应存在显著差异,尽管这两个国家对危机的反应模式相似。由于不需要考虑公众舆论,中国当局的反应比俄罗斯更迅速,但政策方案有所不同。随着中国出口市场的萎缩,工厂关闭,数百万工人失业,因此政府试图刺激国内需求并投资基础设施。在俄罗斯,金融领域的重大投资主导了应对措施,政府面临着严重的社会反应,包括全国各地的罢工和示威。结果是可以比较的,但是危机揭示了两个政权在明显不同的社会经济环境下的不同做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信