The 2008 Global Financial Crisis and COVID-19 Pandemic: How Safe are the Safe Haven Assets?

Muhammad A. Cheema, R. Faff, Kenneth Szulczuk
{"title":"The 2008 Global Financial Crisis and COVID-19 Pandemic: How Safe are the Safe Haven Assets?","authors":"Muhammad A. Cheema, R. Faff, Kenneth Szulczuk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3590015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the performance of safe haven assets during two stressful stock market regimes – the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis across the ten largest economies in the world shows that the traditional choice, gold, acts as a safe haven during the GFC but fails to protect investor wealth during COVID. Our results suggest that investors might have lost trust in gold. Furthermore, silver does not serve as a safe haven during either crisis. The Swiss Franc serves as a strong safe haven during both crises; whereas, the US dollar acts more effective as a safe haven during the GFC than in COVID. The US Treasuries maintain its safe havens status during both crises even though the US has the highest death toll and infection rates of COVID in the world. The largest cryptocurrency, Bitcoin appears as a speculative asset and presents more systematic risk than investment in the stock markets during COVID. Finally, the largest stablecoin, Tether emerges as an effective global safe haven across the sample countries during COVID. Thus, our results suggest that, during a pandemic, investors should prefer liquid and stable assets rather than gold.","PeriodicalId":130177,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of safe haven assets during two stressful stock market regimes – the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis across the ten largest economies in the world shows that the traditional choice, gold, acts as a safe haven during the GFC but fails to protect investor wealth during COVID. Our results suggest that investors might have lost trust in gold. Furthermore, silver does not serve as a safe haven during either crisis. The Swiss Franc serves as a strong safe haven during both crises; whereas, the US dollar acts more effective as a safe haven during the GFC than in COVID. The US Treasuries maintain its safe havens status during both crises even though the US has the highest death toll and infection rates of COVID in the world. The largest cryptocurrency, Bitcoin appears as a speculative asset and presents more systematic risk than investment in the stock markets during COVID. Finally, the largest stablecoin, Tether emerges as an effective global safe haven across the sample countries during COVID. Thus, our results suggest that, during a pandemic, investors should prefer liquid and stable assets rather than gold.
2008年全球金融危机和新冠肺炎疫情:避险资产有多安全?
本文比较了2008年全球金融危机和2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行这两种紧张的股市制度下避险资产的表现。我们对全球十大经济体的分析表明,传统选择黄金在全球金融危机期间充当了避风港,但在COVID期间未能保护投资者的财富。我们的研究结果表明,投资者可能已经对黄金失去了信任。此外,在这两次危机中,白银都不能作为避风港。在两次危机中,瑞士法郎都充当了强大的避风港;而在全球金融危机期间,美元作为避风港的作用比在新冠肺炎期间更有效。在这两次危机中,美国国债都保持了避风港的地位,尽管美国是全球死亡人数和感染率最高的国家。最大的加密货币比特币似乎是一种投机性资产,在COVID期间比股票市场投资更具系统性风险。最后,最大的稳定币Tether在COVID期间成为样本国家有效的全球避风港。因此,我们的研究结果表明,在大流行期间,投资者应该选择流动性和稳定的资产,而不是黄金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信