Rehabilitation of Formalism or “A Monument to the Scientific Error 2.0”: Viktor Shklovsky’s Zhili-byli

M. Lipovetsky
{"title":"Rehabilitation of Formalism or “A Monument to the Scientific Error 2.0”: Viktor Shklovsky’s Zhili-byli","authors":"M. Lipovetsky","doi":"10.1515/cjss-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article analyzes different strategies that Viktor Shklovsky uses in his book of memoirs, Zhili-byli (1964), to re-articulate and re-introduce previously slandered and banned formalism. Sometimes, these strategies disguise such key formalist concepts as ostranenie (defamiliarization) by the less “provocative” terms or mock the official assessments of formalism by intentional contradictions and yawning omissions. Sometimes, they create associative connections that advance the formalist concepts and project them onto social and historical reality. Sometimes, they lead to the invention of new concepts that either distort or modify the logic of early formalism. Thus, in Zhili-byli Shklovsky reintroduces formalism while seemingly repenting for mistakes of the past and rehearsing orthodox aesthetic mantras about the superiority of realism and socialist realism over modernism and the avant-garde.","PeriodicalId":106222,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Slavic Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cjss-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article analyzes different strategies that Viktor Shklovsky uses in his book of memoirs, Zhili-byli (1964), to re-articulate and re-introduce previously slandered and banned formalism. Sometimes, these strategies disguise such key formalist concepts as ostranenie (defamiliarization) by the less “provocative” terms or mock the official assessments of formalism by intentional contradictions and yawning omissions. Sometimes, they create associative connections that advance the formalist concepts and project them onto social and historical reality. Sometimes, they lead to the invention of new concepts that either distort or modify the logic of early formalism. Thus, in Zhili-byli Shklovsky reintroduces formalism while seemingly repenting for mistakes of the past and rehearsing orthodox aesthetic mantras about the superiority of realism and socialist realism over modernism and the avant-garde.
形式主义的复辟或“科学错误的纪念碑2.0”:维克托·什克洛夫斯基的日利比利
摘要:本文分析了维克多·什克洛夫斯基在其回忆录《日利-拜利》(1964)中使用的不同策略,以重新表述和重新引入先前被诽谤和禁止的形式主义。有时,这些策略用不那么“挑衅”的术语来掩饰诸如ostranenie(陌生感)之类的关键形式主义概念,或者用故意的矛盾和令人瞠目的遗漏来嘲弄官方对形式主义的评估。有时,它们创造了联想联系,推进了形式主义概念,并将它们投射到社会和历史现实中。有时,它们导致新概念的发明,这些新概念扭曲或修改了早期形式主义的逻辑。因此,在《日利比利》中,什克洛夫斯基重新引入了形式主义,同时似乎在忏悔过去的错误,并排练了正统的美学咒语,即现实主义和社会主义现实主义优于现代主义和前卫主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信