Measurement survey of server-side DNSSEC adoption

Matthäus Wander
{"title":"Measurement survey of server-side DNSSEC adoption","authors":"Matthäus Wander","doi":"10.23919/TMA.2017.8002913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper answers the question how far DNSSEC signing has found adoption in practice. By applying zone enumeration techniques on all top-level domains we gather the number of 6.4 million signed second-level domains. This figure is a complete snapshot of the DNSSEC ecosystem as of January 2017. The adoption concentrates among a small number of top-level domains, some of them having half of their domains signed with DNSSEC, while most top-level domains have adoption ratios of 1%, or less. The majority of top-level domains use NSEC3 hashing to thwart zone enumeration, but GPU-based zone enumeration allows us to recover 79% of cleartext domain names. Most second-level domains use RSA as signing algorithm with a combination of 2048-bit and 1024-bit keys, but 512-bit keys are also common despite being demonstrably insecure. ECDSA adoption has grown to 8% within the last two years. 0.45% of domains are not signed correctly and fail to validate. However, there are fewer domains failing due to DNSSEC errors than due to other misconfigurations or network problems.","PeriodicalId":118082,"journal":{"name":"2017 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2017.8002913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This paper answers the question how far DNSSEC signing has found adoption in practice. By applying zone enumeration techniques on all top-level domains we gather the number of 6.4 million signed second-level domains. This figure is a complete snapshot of the DNSSEC ecosystem as of January 2017. The adoption concentrates among a small number of top-level domains, some of them having half of their domains signed with DNSSEC, while most top-level domains have adoption ratios of 1%, or less. The majority of top-level domains use NSEC3 hashing to thwart zone enumeration, but GPU-based zone enumeration allows us to recover 79% of cleartext domain names. Most second-level domains use RSA as signing algorithm with a combination of 2048-bit and 1024-bit keys, but 512-bit keys are also common despite being demonstrably insecure. ECDSA adoption has grown to 8% within the last two years. 0.45% of domains are not signed correctly and fail to validate. However, there are fewer domains failing due to DNSSEC errors than due to other misconfigurations or network problems.
服务器端DNSSEC采用的测量调查
本文回答了DNSSEC签名在实践中被采用的程度。通过对所有顶级域名应用区域枚举技术,我们收集了640万个签名二级域名的数量。这个数字是截至2017年1月DNSSEC生态系统的完整快照。采用集中在少数顶级域名中,其中一些有一半的域名与DNSSEC签署,而大多数顶级域名的采用率为1%或更低。大多数顶级域名使用NSEC3散列来阻止区域枚举,但基于gpu的区域枚举允许我们恢复79%的明文域名。大多数二级域使用RSA作为签名算法,使用2048位和1024位密钥的组合,但512位密钥也很常见,尽管显然不安全。ECDSA的采用率在过去两年中增长到了8%。0.45%的域未正确签名且验证失败。然而,由于DNSSEC错误而失败的域比由于其他错误配置或网络问题而失败的域要少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信