Shakespeare’s Mavericks and the Machiavellian Moment

Frances M. Ringwood
{"title":"Shakespeare’s Mavericks and the Machiavellian Moment","authors":"Frances M. Ringwood","doi":"10.4314/sisa.v32i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Niccolo Machiavelli’s works impacted Shakespeare’s context directly through the availability of manuscript translations. There were also a variety of sources where Machiavelli’s impact was indirect – for example, the mirror for princes genre, Innocent Gentillet’s Discours Contre Machiavel (1576) and Marlowe’s plays featuring the stage Machiavel. Shakespeare may also have known Edmund Spenser, who was familiar with The Prince (1532). Machiavelli’s contribution to ideas about politics, across different borders and historical contexts, has been demonstrated by intellectual historians, Quentin Skinner and J.G.A. Pocock. They show Machiavelli’s contribution to destabilising accepted myths about monarchical supremacy. This article discusses Hal’s, Hamlet’s and Kent’s exercising of their political will as unique responses to the complicated political intrigues of 1 Henry IV, Hamlet and King Lear. These political mavericks demonstrate coherent psychological responses to poisonous political situations.","PeriodicalId":334648,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sisa.v32i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Niccolo Machiavelli’s works impacted Shakespeare’s context directly through the availability of manuscript translations. There were also a variety of sources where Machiavelli’s impact was indirect – for example, the mirror for princes genre, Innocent Gentillet’s Discours Contre Machiavel (1576) and Marlowe’s plays featuring the stage Machiavel. Shakespeare may also have known Edmund Spenser, who was familiar with The Prince (1532). Machiavelli’s contribution to ideas about politics, across different borders and historical contexts, has been demonstrated by intellectual historians, Quentin Skinner and J.G.A. Pocock. They show Machiavelli’s contribution to destabilising accepted myths about monarchical supremacy. This article discusses Hal’s, Hamlet’s and Kent’s exercising of their political will as unique responses to the complicated political intrigues of 1 Henry IV, Hamlet and King Lear. These political mavericks demonstrate coherent psychological responses to poisonous political situations.
莎士比亚的小牛队和马基雅维利时刻
马基雅维利的作品通过手稿翻译直接影响了莎士比亚的语境。也有很多来源表明马基雅维利的影响是间接的——例如,王子的镜子类型,Innocent Gentillet的论述反对马基雅维利(1576)和马洛的戏剧以舞台马基雅维利为特色。莎士比亚可能也认识埃德蒙·斯宾塞,他对《王子》(1532)很熟悉。马基雅维利对政治思想的贡献,跨越了不同的国界和历史背景,已经被思想界的历史学家昆汀·斯金纳(Quentin Skinner)和J.G.A.波科克(J.G.A. Pocock)证明。它们显示了马基雅维利对打破公认的君主至上神话的贡献。本文讨论了哈尔、哈姆雷特和肯特对亨利四世、哈姆雷特和李尔王复杂的政治阴谋的独特回应。这些政治特立独行者对有毒的政治局势表现出连贯的心理反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信